A man with “the Right Stuff”

Earlier this week, Astronaut John Young resigned from NASA. I was dismayed with the short shrift that the local newspaper gave to the retirement of this legend in spaceflight — indeed, there is not even a mention of Mr. Young on the Chronicle’s spaceflight section.
But make no mistake about it, John Young is an American hero. Mr. Young served as a NASA astronaut for an incredible 42-year career, which included spending more than 800 hours in space. His unprecedented career began with the first manned flight of the Gemini program in 1965, included two Apollo moon missions, and concluded with two flights on the space shuttle, including its first flight. John Young is the longest serving astronaut of them all.
Mr Young was a US Navy test pilot when he signed up for the second astronaut class in 1962. His first mission was to pilot the first manned voyage of the Gemini program — Gemini 3 — which was the first American space flight to have more than one astronaut on board. In 1966, Mr. Young commanded Gemini 10, which performed the first dual rendezvous procedures during a single mission.
Three years later, and two months before Neal Armstrong set foot on the Moon, Mr Young performed the test mission to the Moon in Apollo 10, in which he orbited the Moon in the command module. He subsequently returned to the Moon in 1972 as commander of Apollo 16 in which he piloted the lunar module to its perfect landing and drove a mooncraft 16 miles across the surface of the Moon. Including the liftoff from the Moon’s surface, Mr. Young was the the first man to blast into space seven times.
In 1981, Mr. Young piloted the space shuttle?s inaugural flight and guided the Columbia to a perfect runway landing, which was also a first. Two years later, Mr. Young commanded the Columbia in his sixth and final mission. He is also the only astronaut to pilot four different kinds of spacecraft.
And although a NASA lifer, Mr. Young never compromised his aviator principles for his position in the agency. In 1987, he was abruptly removed as NASA’s chief astronaut when he accused NASA’s chiefs of putting “launch schedule pressure” ahead of safety in the wake of the Challenger accident. His criticism was later vindicated by the report of the Presidential Commission that investigated the Challenger accident.
Just like the late astronaut Gordon Cooper and his fellow Mercury astronauts, John Young has “the Right Stuff.” Here’s hoping for a long and fulfilling retirement for this local Houston and American hero.

Remember Martin Frankel?

Given the federal government’s increasing propensity to regulate business through criminalizing questionable business transactions, it’s easy to overlook the instances where the criminal justice system actually punishes a real bonafide business crook.
Martin Frankel was a small-time New York money manager in the early 1990’s who was paralyzed with fear from trading stocks. Accordingly, rather than trade equities, Frankel arranged for the acquisition of a group of financially-troubled insurance companies throughout the 1990’s. He then used the assets of those insurance companies to pull off a several hundred million dollar scam, which is one of the largest insurance frauds in American history.
With investigators closing in on him in May, 1999, Frankel bought millions of dollars worth of diamonds, wired money to accounts all over the world, torched any remaining paper trail, and fled the country for Germany under a blaze of publicity. He was apprehended in Germany several months later, spent a year and a half in a German prison, and then was extradicted to the United States to face criminal charges here.
Although largely forgotten in the wake of Enron and other large business meltdowns, Frankel turned out to be a fascinating character. He was a gawky misfit with an obsessive terror of germs who nevertheless was able to induce attractive young women to fight over him. Although intensely reclusive, Frankel was able to build an intricate Ponzi scheme that was in no small part attributable to his talent for luring prominent people — such as Texas Democratic powerbroker Robert Strauss — into his scam. He even created a phony Catholic charity that went into business with a group of priests with close Vatican ties.
The Wall Street Journal’s Ellen Joan Pollock was a lead writer on the reporting team that covered the FBI’s four-month international manhunt for Frankel, and she eventually wrote a good book about the affair called The Pretender. With the right treatment (are you listening Professor Ribstein?), Frankel’s story of risky business deals, duplicitous businessmen, con artists, jewelry traders, women looking for love, women looking for money, revengeful husbands, and slick private detectives is a potential blockbuster movie just waiting for the right screenplay.
At any rate, as this NY Times article reports, Frankel’s affair came to a typically bizarre close yesterday, as he was sentenced to almost 17 years in the slammer:

The most bizarre 45 minutes took place when the judge allowed Mr. Frankel to address the court. He used the opportunity to settle old scores, quote the Bible, crack a joke and plead for leniency. He said most of his misdeeds were caused by his love for a co-conspirator, Sonia Howe, and his desire to earn enough money to protect her two children from harm. The judge was a bit incredulous.
“So, you stole $209 million in order to take care of the children?” she said.
“No,” he said. “Can I explain it to you?”
“I’m begging you to explain it to me,” the judge said.

Meanwhile, as the admitted perpetrator of one of the largest insurance scams in American history was sentenced to 17 years in prison, a mid-level accountant who did what his bosses told him to do in regard to a merely questionable business transaction continues to serve a 24 year prison sentence.
Folks, you cannot ask for a starker example of the injustice that results from government criminalizing dubious business transactions to assuage public animus toward business failures such as Enron. If government cannot tell the difference between Martin Frankel and Jamie Olis, then it is unlikely that it can tell the difference between Martin Frankel and you or me.

Southwest Airlines attempts to expand Chicago operation

You gotta love Southwest Airlines, Inc.
While most of the legacy airlines are trying to figure out either how to avoid bankruptcy or find financing to exit bankruptcy, Dallas-based Southwest just continues to execute its methodical business plan of expanding its low-cost operations in markets that respond to it.
Yesterday, Southwest bid more than $100 million for some key assets of bankrupt airline ATA Holdings Corp., including six of ATA’s 14 gates at Chicago’s Midway Airport.
The addition of the six ATA gates would increase Southwest’s capacity at Midway by nearly a third. The airline operates about 150 daily flights from Midway and has already announced it would add 25 more by the middle of next year even without the ATA asset acquisition. The company has more than 2,500 employees in Chicago, which is its fourth largest operation.
Southwest is battling for ATA’s assets with another low-cost airline, AirTran, which has submitted a $90 million bid. The Midway gates would give either carrier an increased presence in Chicago, which is the key high-traffic city in the central United States. The fight over Indianapolis-based ATA’s holdings began last October when it filed its Chapter 11 case, which is the first large low-cost carrier to file bankruptcy during this latest period of carnage in the always tumultuous American airline industry.

HUD freezes City of Houston housing funds

The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development took the extraordinary step yesterday of freezing $48 million of federal funds allocated to the City of Houston until the City corrects over two dozen serious problems in its administration of a program to assist low income families to purchase homes.
The City’s administration of HUD funds has been scandalous for as long as I can remember. Rather than encouraging responsible persons in the private sector to become involved in providing quality low income housing to Houston’s citizens, multiple City administrations have traditionally allowed the HUD funds to be misused in lining the pockets of political hacks and flighty businessmen interested only in making a quick buck. It is going to take more than Mayor Bill White‘s platitudes to clean up this mess, which has now become firmly engrained in the fabric of the City of Houston government.
Houston is home to dozens of superb and creative and developers of income-producing residential real estate. Mayor White should tap that civic resource and create an advisory committee to oversee a complete overhaul of this den of corruption. Until that occurs, expect that the federal funds that could be used to subsidize well conceived and constructed low-income housing will continue to be used in Houston to line the pockets of the swindlers who would leach off of those who can least afford it.

Is Landry’s making a play for the Stros?

As noted in this earlier post, Drayton McLane may be quietly trying to sell the Stros. This Chronicle article speculates that Landry’s announcement yesterday that it has completed arrangements for almost $850 million in debt may portend a move by Landry’s CEO Tilman Fertitta to buy the club. During spring training earlier this year, Mr. McLane denied publicly that he was negotiating to sell the team to Mr. Fertitta. Stay tuned. Scott Boras will be watching this development carefully.

Well, what do you think about J.D. Drew?

On the heels of the news earlier this week that the Stros had offered Carlos Beltran a seven year deal worth $81 million, Baseball Prospectus’ Joe Sheehan was asked about Beltran in a recent chat session:

Question: How much is Carlos Beltran really worth for what he’s going to give you and his likelihood of staying healthy?
Joe Sheehan: Beltran has a lot of value that doesn’t show up in his Triple Crown stats, with a good walk rate, top-tier defense, and one of the best SB success rates in history. Put it all together with a good health record and his age, and I’d be comfortable exceeding Vlad Guerrero’s 5 yrs/$70MM deal, conceding that Guerrero’s numbers were held down by the speculation over his back.
I expect Beltran to get much more than that, something like 7 yrs/$126MM, or even 8 yrs/$144MM if the Yankees win the bidding.

As for the question in the subject of this post, here are Drew’s statistics.

Want to buy a lawsuit against a law firm?

The bankruptcy judge in the bankruptcy case of former tech law firm Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison has decided to conduct an auction of Brobeck’s cause of action against old line law firm Clifford Chance.
The theory of Brobeck’s case is that Clifford Chance caused Brobeck’s decline by inducing 17 key Brobeck partners to defect to Clifford Chance.
The idea of the auction arose earlier this week when the trustee in Brobeck’s bankruptcy case attempted to settle the lawsuit against Clifford Chance for $4.5 million. At the hearing on approval of the settlement, a group of creditors objected to the settlement when a coalition of plaintiff’s lawyers (including several from the Houston area) offered $4.8 million for the lawsuit, and the bankruptcy judge decided simply to sell the lawsuit to highest bidder. Both Clifford Chance and the plaintiff’s lawyers group appear poised to participate in the “lawsuit auction.”
Interestingly, there has been no outcry from tort reformers regarding this unseemly trading in outlandish damage claims. ;^)

The List-Eater

And just in case anyone thinks that Notre Dame has the market cornered on over-the-top football fans, check out this story about a dispute that broke out at Texas A&M University over buying Cotton Bowl tickets:

A woman, who is a senior at Texas A&M, who asked that her identity be withheld, shoved a paper copy of a waiting list for SBC Cotton Bowl tickets into her mouth to secure her place in line while waiting to pull tickets for the sold-out game at about 6 a.m. Thursday.
“The piece of paper doesn’t justify a spot in line to me if no one is standing there,” she said. “If they wanted a spot, they should’ve woken up.”

Aggie blogger Chris Elam over at Safety for Dummies is all over the story, and even identifies the notorious List-Eater.
Lawsuits certainly to follow.

The trouble at Notre Dame

Having followed college football my entire life, I would have never thought that the University of Notre Dame would have a hard time hiring a head football coach.
Until now.
A week or so ago, Notre Dame fired Tyrone Willingham — a highly-regarded coach within the profession who will not be without a job for long — after three seasons and a 21-15 record. Since that time, both the retiring Notre Dame president and its athletic director have stated publicly that they did approve of the firing.
But, as the Washington Post’s Sally Jenkins points out in this op-ed, if they did not approve of Coach Willingham’s termination, who did?:

Now, the only thing that has taken a hit here is Notre Dame’s affectations. [President] Malloy’s statement begs the question: If the school president isn’t responsible for Willingham’s firing, then who is? . . . [I] have to wonder if this pale after-the-fact confession is what passes for administrative support at Notre Dame these days. Malloy’s statement was easy enough to say a week later and 700 miles away. He was in the room where Willingham’s fate was being determined. But he deferred, citing his impending retirement.

As Ms. Jenkins notes, for all its nostalgic value, the Notre Dame football program is simply not all that attractive to good football players anymore:

Notre Dame has become a creaking old fraud. That’s why people don’t want to go there anymore. Its integrity is based on yellowing old cinema reels. Its facilities are outmoded (although it does still have that stadium.) Its recruiting pitch is no longer persuasive: as a destination for coaches and blue-chip recruits, its appeal falls somewhere between those of sleek warm-weather football schools, and the more elite educational institutions such as Stanford and Duke. It’s not just old; it’s cold.

[Moreover,] the Irish have struggled on the field for nearly a decade and a half now. It’s been 16 years since they won the last of their record eight titles, and 10 seasons since they won a bowl game. They’ve lost four straight to Boston College, three to Tennessee and two in a row to Purdue. And they’ve had just two NFL first-round draft picks since 1999 — compared with nine for Ohio State and 21 for Miami.

Which leads me to pass along an old joke among college football aficionados:

Q. What do you call Notre Dame without a football program?
A. Creighton.

At any rate, Notre Dame will eventually find a good football coach, although it is far from certain that the new coach will fair any better than Coach Willingham, who remains a good coach. Rather, Notre Dame’s real problem is reflected best by the hypocrisy of the statements made by its president and athletic director decrying the termination of Coach Willingham.
You see, these two administrators have negotiated the most lucrative television contract of any university athletic program in the nation and have overseen the raising of tens of millions recently to expand Notre Dame’s historic stadium. Then, after having a key role in creating this swamp of financial expectations, these two fellows criticize a move that was made precisely because the football program was not meeting those high expectations. Frankly, a much better case can be made that the firing of Coach Willingham was utterly consistent with the values that have become most important in the Notre Dame football program.
Notre Dame is relearning the hard lesson that you reap what you sow. The timing of Notre Dame’s realization of that enduring truth will have much more to do with the re-emergence of its football program than whoever the Domers choose as their next football coach.
And it would help to find another Joe Montana out there somewhere. ;^)

Fifth Circuit issues mold coverage decision

The Fifth Circuit issued an opinion yesterday in Fiess v. State Farm Lloyds in which the primary issue was whether mold damage was covered under a homeowner’s policy. In reversing a summary judgment in the insurer’s favor, the Fifth Circuit applied the doctrine of concurrent cause in concluding that the insureds might be able to segregate covered losses from uncovered losses. In so doing, the Fifth Circuit also certified the following question to the Texas Supreme Court:

Does the ensuing loss provision contained in Section IExclusions, part 1(f) of the Homeowners Form B (HO-B) insurance policy as prescribed by the Texas Department of Insurance effective July 8, 1992 (Revised January 1, 1996), when read in conjunction with the remainder of the policy, provide coverage for mold contamination caused by water damage that is otherwise covered under the policy?