An Aggie Rudy?

rudy3.jpgAs this Brent Zwerneman/San Antonio Express-News article reports,Texas Aggie non-scholarship football player Ben Bitner walks to the beat of a different drummer:

Texas A&M football player Ben Bitner’s long hair and serene manner earned him the nickname “Baby Jesus” from a teammate.
And in a tale of biblical proportions, two years ago Bitner found himself with no room at the inn.
After a dispute with a roommate over bills, Bitner, a nonscholarship junior defensive back for A&M, moved out of a house in College Station following the Aggies’ appearance in the Jan. 1, 2005 Cotton Bowl.
For a year and a half, Bitner didn’t have a place to stay. He lived under creek bridges on the A&M campus, in a fort he built in the woods near the school’s golf driving range and anywhere he could stretch his hammock or lay his sleeping bag around Aggieland.
When he wasn’t finding shadowy crannies to catch some shuteye ó “Out of sight, out of mind,” he said ó Bitner was attending classes as a history major and excelling on the Aggies’ scout team. The 5-foot-3, 160-pounder from Round Rock has played in two games this year as a member of the kickoff squad.
“I guess I’m not that smart of a guy,” said Bitner, who’s finally living in a house again. “But it was enjoyable. I slept better then than I sleep now. I didn’t have to worry about cleaning up after myself or paying bills. It suited me just fine.” [. . .]
Bitner owned a couple sets of clothes ó “I’m not one of those guys who needs 10 different shirts,” he said ó and occasionally he simply would throw his duds in his laundry bag in the team’s locker room by Kyle Field.
He would shower and clean up in the locker room or at the school’s recreation center. At night, wherever he was curled up, campus security occasionally approached him and wondered what he was doing.
“I never tried to sleep in the same place on consecutive nights,” Bitner said. “If they ran into me, they’d ask if I was student while I’d start packing my stuff. I’d tell them, ‘Yeah, sorry, I’ll get going,’ and I’d just walk off.”
Bitner said he never minded the cold days, because his parents kept their house cold when he was growing up.
“In December, January and February, that’s when it was easiest for me to sleep outside,” Bitner said. “It was hard to sleep in the summer.” [. . .]
Starter Melvin Bullitt always drilled Bitner with one question, too, during his nomadic days.
“If you take a girl out,” Bullitt would inquire, “do you ask her, ‘Hey, want to come back to my place?'”
Explained Bitner: “Hopefully, the girl would invite me back to her place. If not, I needed to get to know her a little better before I broke the news that I was homeless. . .”

Is Tony Blair’s Princess Di premonition coming true?

Tony Blair-big.jpgDuring a scene of Stephen Frears’ clever film, The Queen, British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s staff is relishing the public disdain for the Royal Family’s restrained response to Princess Diana’s death because it makes Blair — who made a passionate public response — look good in comparison. Blair — played brilliantly by Michael Sheen — grows frustrated with his staff’s gloating because he knows that the same public venom that is being directed toward the Royal Family could just as easily be directed toward him.
Based on this Daily Telegraph article, Blair may be receiving precisely what he feared:

We have become like any other nation. No more can we tell ourselves that British corruption scandals are qualitatively different from those of hot countries, or that the peccadilloes that shake our polity would barely make the newspapers in Italy. In 1994, in his first major speech as Labour leader, Tony Blair promised that, under his leadership, Britain would never again be out of step with Europe. Now, in a grisly kind of way, his ambition has been fulfilled.
With so many sleaze stories in our news pages, it is easy to become confused. A prominent Labour donor has been profiting from the recommendations of his own task-force. Gordon Brown’s supporters accuse Mr Blair of seeking to drag their man into the mire with him. Meanwhile, the Government has ordered an abrupt halt to the inquiry into allegations of hidden arms commissions, just as others begin to suspect corruption.
The sheer blizzard of allegations can leave us snow-blind. Perhaps, we tell ourselves, this is what all governments do. Perhaps Labour is no different from its predecessors. After all, wasn’t John Major brought down after a series of sexual and financial scandals?
Yes, he was. But what is happening now is of a different order. The central accusation against this ministry ñ that it has sold favours, possibly even places in the legislature, to secret donors ñ is one that has not been seriously levelled at a British government since the introduction of the universal franchise. [. . .]
Tony Blair’s belief in the superiority of his motives leads him to reason that, when the New Labour project is at stake, the ends justify the means.
We saw this within weeks of his accession when he sought to explain the Ecclestone affair ñ the first of many cash-for-favours scandals ñ on the basis that he was a pretty straight kinda guy. That, essentially, remains his attitude: he regards complaints about probity as petty next to what he is doing for Britain.
A decade later, parliament is cheapened, and the police have been called into Downing Street. That, more than the transformation of his party, more than Scottish devolution, more even than Iraq, will be his legacy.

The Smart Money

betting-069-06.gifAs Captain Renault — Claude Rains’ character in Casablanca — might say, “I’m shocked, shocked that there is betting on sporting events!:”

The Brain Trust [is] a shadowy cabal of gamblers who wager enormous amounts of money on sports events, using a supercomputer and a SWAT team of injury and weather experts to take advantage of minor discrepancies in the point spreads set up by the Vegas linemakers. Itís a multimillion-dollar business ó and legal ó but thereís a wrinkle: they like to bet hundreds of thousands of dollars per game, and whenever the casinos sniff out betting syndicates like the Brain Trust, they show them the door in a heartbeat. Thatís because in addition to risking huge losses each week, the bookmakers are forced to adjust their betting lines ó sometimes by two or three points for a football game ó whenever the ìsmart moneyî wades in, since they desperately need other customers to bet the other side to balance their action and stand a chance of making money.

The foregoing excerpt is from this NY Times book review of Michael Konik’s new book, The Smart Money (Simon & Schuster 2006). As Konik notes, the Brain Trust attempts to manipulate the point spread on sporting events in the same way that hedge funds and currency speculators attempt to move the stock market on certain stocks and currencies. Capt. Renault would almost certainly be playing.

2006 Weekly local football review

Carr getting sacked again.jpgPatriots 40 Texans 7
Just when you thought it was impossible for the Texans (4-10) to stoop any lower, the Texans’ offense rolled over and played dead against the Patriots.
This one was over by Sunday morning brunch as the Texans were down 17-zip after the first quarter and 27-zip at half. Actually, the Texans’ defense did not play badly, but the Texans offense continually placed the defense in untenable positions. QB David Carr continues to look like a basket case, going 16-28 for a net 93 yards with 4 interceptions, 4 sacks and, as usual, no TD passes. I have long had doubts about Carr, but it’s becoming more certain with each passing game that Carr will not be an effective QB for the Texans. Whether it’s the constant pounding that he has taken as a result of the lack of protection from the Texans’ deficient offensive line, his poor recognition skills or his dubious leadership qualities, Carr has regressed to a point in Houston that Coach Gary Kubiak’s sideline vibes decisively indicate that he has given up on Carr.
However, as bad as Carr has been, certainly Kubiak and Texans’ owner Bob McNair have to share in the blame for the woeful state of this team. As noted earlier here, after giving up on the Casserly-Capers regime, McNair changed the management model of the Texans football operation from a strong GM model to a strong head coach model. There is nothing wrong with that, but rather than hiring an experienced head coach, McNair opted for local boy-made-good Kubiak, who had never been more than a top offensive assistant in a strong head coach model that was run by an offensive coach (Denver’s Mike Shanahan). The transition from assistant to head coach has been anything but smooth for Kubiak — the Texans’ defense has improved somewhat from last season’s disastrous unit, but the Texans’ offense is actually worse than last season’s, which was almost unimaginable before this season began. Add in the fact that Carr and the Texans’ offense have actually regressed in development under Kubiak’s tutelage, the luster of Kubiak’s reputation as an up-and-coming offensive coach has certainly been dulled.
At any rate, the Texans have two home games left to end the season, against the Colts (10-3, playing tonight) and the Browns (4-10). It looks as if the Texans’ offense has packed it in, so it’s hard to imagine that the team could beat anyone these days. But stranger things have happened. Let’s just hope that another win or two doesn’t result in a dramatic downward change in the Texans’ draft position for the 2007 NFL Draft. The Texans need all the help they can get.

The University of Houston Master Plan

The University of Houston has been making some big plans recently, and this Matt Tresaugue/Chronicle article reviews them:

UH leaders intend to transform the campus with more housing, more restaurants, more shops and other places to be outside the classroom.

The goal, campus leaders said, is to create an environment that attracts the best scholars and encourages them to stick around. [. . .]

The plan also calls for doubling the usable square footage of classroom and office space, replacing parking lots with garages and closing part of Cullen to create a tree-lined pedestrian walkway by 2020.

What’s more, the campus would meld with the surrounding Third Ward while reducing blight and encouraging more retailers to move in. University officials already are talking with private developers about a “town center” with shops and restaurants on both sides of Scott between Holman and Alabama.

Campus leaders do not know how much everything would cost but estimate the first five-year phase at $300 million, and largely at the university’s expense. The redevelopment plan will be a key piece of an upcoming fundraising campaign, officials said.[ . . .]

The new plan would establish five themed precincts on campus, reflecting the “smart growth” trend elsewhere, with dense housing, retail and office space in village configurations.

The interior of the campus would be almost untouched.

To the north, campus leaders envision an arts village with a sculpture garden, outdoor amphitheater, cafes, galleries and housing, including loft apartments, on what are now parking lots.

About 1.6 million square feet of academic buildings and housing for graduate students would be added to the so-called professional precinct, to the east of the campus core.

Another area, the Wheeler precinct, would be devoted to undergraduates, with plans calling for low-rise residence halls to blend with the nearby University Oaks neighborhood.

To the west would be a Robertson Stadium precinct with 1.9 million square feet in new academic buildings, housing and retail near two proposed Metro light rail lines.

The University’s summary of its master plan — with renditions and video — is here.

Despite the story on the ambitious UH master plan, the Chronicle still ignores the more important story about UH.

The University of Houston in many ways is the most remarkable major public university in Texas. Started in 1927 as a junior college, UH grew quickly during its infancy while being endowed entirely with philanthropic contributions from generous Houstonians, which was made all the more remarkable by the fact that, at the same time, Houstonians were also contributing substantial amounts to the Rice University endowment.

Inasmuch as bustling UH did not even become a state university until 1963, UH has received only a fraction of the endowed capital that the state has provided to its two older public university systems, the University of Texas and Texas A&M University.

As a result, UH routinely provides a comparable contribution to Houston and the state as UT and A&M while operating with far less capital than those two institutions, which means that UH provides “more bang for the educational buck” than either UT or A&M.

With the recent expansion of the MD Anderson Library into the centerpiece of the central campus, along with the development of innovative programs such as the Honors College, UH has already become an increasingly attractive choice for Texas students.

Implementation of the master plan is the next logical step in that evolution.

It’s good that the local newspaper is noticing that, but it makes one wonder how much more benefit UH could contribute to Houston and the state if its endowed capital were on par with that of UT or A&M?

That’s a story that needs to be examined, and here’s hoping that the Chronicle eventually tackles it.

It’s football time in Texas

AFL owners.jpgIt’s the lull before the onslaught of the college football bowl games, but football still permeates the culture of Texas as the high school playoffs move toward conclusion, the Cowboys contend for an NFL playoff berth and the Texans prepare for the 2007 NFL draft. The following are a few interesting football-related items that I noticed over the past week:
Dallas native and longtime Kansas City Chiefs owner Lamar Hunt died after a long bout with cancer. Chronicle NFL columnist John McClain recalls a funny story about a meeting between Hunt, Bud Adams and legendarily crusty Chicago Bears owner George Halas at the time that Hunt and Adams were starting the old American Football League in the early 1960’s.
Despite the Texans’ problems, it’s reassuring to know that owner Bob McNair does not panic.
Chronicle sportswriter Dale Robertson reports on the remarkable success story that is the Southlake Carroll Dragons football program (the cheerleading team is another matter, though).
In this interesting column ($), the Wall Street Journal’s resident stathead, Allen St. John, makes a stab at objectively evaluating the pass protection of NFL teams. In so doing, he comes up with a stat that he calls the Sack Factor, which takes the sack yardage a team allows and divides it by the number of pass attempts. The lower the number, the better the protection. Although he finds a correlation between good teams and a low Sack Factor, the statistic needs some refinement — the Texans pass protection, which is hideous, does not rate as one of the worst in the NFL, probably because the Texans’ passing game is based on short, ineffectual pass routes that limit sacks as much as possible.
matthew-mcconaughey-hook-em-horns 121706.jpgThe lovable Ida Mae Crimpton pens her latest column from her porch in Elgin on her beloved Texas Longhorns’ preparations for the Alamo Bowl against the Iowa Hawkeyes. As Ida Mae observes, “Boy, whoever said it isn’t far from the castle to the outhouse sure knew what they were talking about.”
And finally, don’t miss Matt Damon’s hilarious impersonation of Longhorn fan Matthew McConaughey on a recent Letterman show. As Clear Thinkers favorite Dan Jenkins might say, “Dead Solid Perfect!”

BlawgSearch

BlawgSearch.gifThe blawgosphere — that is, the world of law-related blogs — has really come of age over the past couple of years as a research source, so it is becoming increasingly important to have a tool that facilitates research contained in blawgs.
BlawgSearch is a search engine that Tim Stanley and the folks at Justia.com have developed that focuses one’s search on blawgs (Tim’s blog post on BlawgSearch is here). It is in beta right now, but Tim and his crew are adding blawgs on a daily basis. While using it on a variety of issues over the past couple of days, I have found the coverage to be excellent already and far more focused than blawg searches on more generalized engines. Check it out and include it in your bookmarks. This looks like a winner.

Those darn “four-legged fire ants”

feral hog.JPGThis earlier post reported on the emerging market for the meat of feral hogs, which are a fixture of rural (and, increasingly, suburban) Texas.
The Chronicle’s Shannon Tompkins takes the discussion of earlier post several steps further and provides this excellent overview of the feral hog phenomenom in Texas. The battle between humans and hogs is a fascinating story involving a myriad of subjects — including biology, ecology, farming, hunting and game policy — and it appears that the hogs are winning that battle!

Phoenix’s light rail boondoggle

Metrorail car-Houston4.jpgThe dubious economic nature of Houston’s light rail system is a common topic on this blog, so I took interest in this insightful Warren Meyer post that ponders why a light rail system is being built in Warren’s hometown of Phoenix, which is one of the few metro U.S. areas that may be even less conducive to such a system than Houston.
Given the inefficiency and inflexibility of such systems, Warren wonders who supports such boondoggles and suspects that a few powerful businesspeople are using the rail line in an effort to jumpstart the misguided goal of establishing a dominant downtown area in the decentralized Phoenix metro area. Add in a few high-minded environmentalists and many others who are simply ignorant of the enormous cost relative to the benefit of such systems and, as Peter Gordon wryly-noted awhile back:

“It adds up to a winning coalition.”

Unfortunately, as another Phoenix-area resident — Nobel Laureate Ed Prescott — reminded us recently, once such coalitions are successful in establishing a governmental policy subsidizing such boondoggles, it is much more difficult to end the public subsidy of the boondoggle than to start it in the first place.
By the way, Houston Metro’s subsidy of its light rail system has other perverse effects, such as the lack of security for one of the transit options that actually makes sense for the Houston area.

Ed Prescott’s five macroeconomic myths

edprescott4.jpg2004 Nobel Laureate Edward Prescott in this WSJ ($) op-ed lays out five macroeconomic myths and observes as follows:

The sky is not falling. No need to panic and start playing around with all sorts of policy responses. Despite the impression created by some economic pundits, the U.S. economy is not a delicate little machine that needs to be fine-tuned with exact precision by benevolent policymakers to keep from breaking down. Rather, it is large and complex, with millions of people making billions of decisions every day to improve their lives, the lives of their families and the health of their businesses.
On the one hand, it’s difficult to screw up all these well-intentioned people by crafting bad policy, but, on the other hand, it is of course entirely possible to do so. And once things are broken, they are much harder to fix. For example, all those doomsayers predicting a recession will get their wish if taxes are suddenly raised, new productivity-strangling regulations are enacted, the U.S. turns against free trade, or some combination thereof. Otherwise, we should expect 3% real growth, based on 2% increases in productivity and 1% population growth. This economy is fundamentally sound.
So we have to be careful that we don’t believe everything we read in the papers. Things are never as bad as the last data that was released, nor are they as good. Likewise, policy should not be revised at every turn, nor rules changed by political whim. Meaning, we should be careful about accepting conventional wisdom as, well, being wise. One of the great disciplines of economics is that it challenges us to question status quo thinking.

In other words, it’s hard to screw up something as big and complex as the U.S. economy, but we’re eminently capable of doing it with unnecessary and ill-advised policy moves. And it’s much harder to correct the bad policy than to screw up in the first place. That’s a good reason to support this.