This NY Sunday Times article reports on the lawsuit of former federal government oil and gas auditor Bobby L. Maxwell, who is suing Kerr-McGee Corporation in Denver federal court for underpayment of oil and gas royalties to the federal government on oil and gas wells producing on federal lands. Under an obscure federal statute that rewards private citizens who expose fraud against the government, Maxwell and his counsel stand to recover as much as $15 million if they ring the bell in the lawsuit, which is scheduled for trial on January 16.
Although I know nothing about the particulars of the Maxwell case other than what is reported in the article, underpayment of oil and gas royalties is not uncommon. Indeed, when I am retained by royalty owners in a reorganization case of an oil and gas company, my standard advice is for the royalty owners to hire an experienced oil and gas auditor to conduct at least a review of the debtor’s royalty payments. When an oil and gas company starts having financial problems, scrimping on royalty payments is not an unusual occurrence.
Daily Archives: December 5, 2006
Controversial Justice
Longtime Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Judge William Wayne Justice has long been one of most controversial federal judges and, thus, one of the best-known in Texas. The 86-year old Judge Justice was recently back in the news as the first honoree of the Morris Dees Justice Award, named for the famed Alabama civil rights lawyer, which prompted this profile from the Chronicle’s Janet Elliott.
Judge Justice is the quintessential activist federal judge, so he is not the most popular fellow in all quarters. Maybe he should have been in the legislature, but it’s hard not to admire a judge who at 86-years of age still handles a full court docket and chooses to be activist in cases that promote desegregation in education, equal educational opportunity and prison reform. The legislature has never done a particularly good job of dealing with those issues, anyway.
Keep those buses handy
Wendell Cox reports on a little problem that occurred in St. Louis recently that ought (but probably won’t) give the Houston Metropolitan Transit Authority pause:
Buses Replace Light Rail in St. Louis
A large ice storm hit the St. Louis area last night and power is out to nearly one-half of the area. The areaĆs light rail line, Metrolink, has suspended service for much of its alignment and is providing substitute bus service.
Meanwhile, there appears to be no instance of light rail providing replacement for buses anywhere in the metropolitan area — for that matter probably never in history, anywhere. Another demonstration of the flexibility of urban rail.
The enormous cost relative to usage and inflexibility of most rail systems reminds me of something that Peter Gordon observed awhile back about the political forces that support these boondoggles. Some are disingenous promoters seeking to profit from the rail lines, some pose as high-minded environmentalists and many are simply ignorant of the inefficiency and inflexibility of such systems. As Professor Gordon wryly points out:
“It adds up to a winning coalition.”
By the way, Anne Linehan over at blogHouston.net continues to follow another cost of the Houston light rail system that Metro doesn’t much like talking about.