Almost thirty years ago, the University of Houston Board of Regents was faced with a difficult decision — replacing longtime UH president Philip G. Hoffman.
President Hoffman was the quintessential tough act to follow. The unusual administrator who was respected by faculty, administrators, and regents alike, President Hoffman sheparded UH during the era from early 1960’s to the late 1970’s as the university transformed from a sleepy city college into Texas’ first dynamic urban university. An example of President Hoffman’s influence is the fact that, when he took office in 1962, UH was admitting its first minority student and, when he retired as UH president in 1977, UH had become Texas’ most fully-integrated state university by far. Other accomplishments during his tenure included reorganization of UH’s administration into that of a major university, completion of the university’s first real master plan for campus development, implementation of the initial stages of the University of Houston System of campuses, and overseeing the rise of UH’s athletic teams into national powers.
So, given President Hoffman’s accomplishments and stature, the UH Board really needed to make a splash in naming his replacement. Their choice? 35 year-old wunderkind, Barry A. Munitz.
Mr. Munitz was an interesting choice. Hired a year or so earlier as Vice-President and Dean of Faculties at UH’s central campus, the young Mr. Munitz and his glamorous wife cut a sophisticated and trendy swath through UH social circles. The theory behind Mr. Munitz’s appointment was that he represented the new wave of college administrator who encouraged ties between the business and university communities.
Daily Archives: July 4, 2005
More on the black hole that is Metro
In the “could-it-possibly-be-any-worse” department, this Rad Sadlee/Chronicle article reports on the just-released external audit of Houston’s Metropolitan Transit Authority. It’s not a pretty picture:
Comparing Metro’s numbers for fiscal years 2001 and 2004, the audit shows a 29 percent rise in operating costs, to $304 million, and a 36 percent increase per passenger boarding. On the income side, Metro’s annual report shows fare revenue has hovered around $46 million a year since 1995.
The report says ridership slipped 5 percent in the three years, from 100 million yearly boardings to 95 million, despite a one-year bump in 2004 when 5 million boardings on the new MetroRail line offset the loss of 3 million on buses. Most of the loss was on local and express routes, with Park & Ride numbers holding steady.
This less-than-inspiring performance is after Metro plunked down $325 million to construct the underutilized 7.5 mile Red Rail Line from downtown to Reliant Park and Metro’s announcement from a little over a month ago that the agency plans to spend another $104 million on the Red Line — less than three years after completion of the project — to double the number of trains and fix problems caused by construction errors. Then, as if to jolt into perspective the economic absurdity of all of this, Metro and public officials recently announced a modified public transit plan in which Metro puts up $676 million (in addition to the $325 million already spent on the Red Line) in return for an additional $1 billion in federal matching funds. Given how poorly Metro has invested public money to date makes the details of how Metro intends to spend that additional money almost an afterthought, but Anne Linehan over at blogHouston.net and Tory Gattis at Houston Strategies have done a good job of analyzing that issue. By the way, blogHouston.net’s compendium of Metro posts that Ms. Linehan and Kevin Whited have prepared is the flat-out best resource on the web to track what Metro is doing.
Sometimes these things get overlooked on holiday weekends
Inasmuch as my utterly unprofessional opinion is that the Houston area is going to be hammered by a hurricane this season, just a note to let you know that Tropical Depression 3 has just formed in the Atlantic. Current projections have the storm crossing the Yucatan of Mexico, entering the Gulf of Mexico, and heading towards the upper Texas coast, where current forecasts have it reaching the coast by Wednesday morning or so. While over the Gulf, the depression is likely to intensify into a tropical storm if it survives the journey. While satellite imagery and forecast models indicate weakening, upper level conditions over the Gulf support strengthening.
One thing to note during the hurricane season is that computer models do a better job of predicting the track of a storm than its intensity, where an experienced forecaster’s gut reaction often is better than the computer models.
Frankly, a not-too-powerful storm would be welcomed in the Houston area right now as the area is suffering from a combination of typical hot summer tempuratures and a mini-drought over about the past 45 days.