Don’t sweat the small stuff

picture%20of%20drugs.jpgDr. Nortin M. Hadler is a professor of medicine and microbiology/immunology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and attending rheumatologist at the University of North Carolina Hospitals in Chapel Hill. He also sounds in this ABC News op-ed a lot like my father:

To be well is not the same as to feel well.
Being well requires some sense of invincibility. No one is spared symptoms for long.
It’s abnormal to go one year without upper respiratory symptoms or pain.
Lurking in our future are heartache and heartburn, shoulder and knee pain, headache, rashes and skipped heartbeats — not to mention bothersome fatigue, sore muscles, bowel irregularity, insomnia and so much else to challenge our sense of well-being.
Nearly all of these predicaments can go away as mysteriously as they come about. To be well requires the wherewithal to cope with these ailments for as long as that takes — and it can take weeks. [. . .]
We all need to get beyond the traditional complaint of “what’s wrong with me, Doc, that I have this symptom?” and move on to more rational discourse, such as “is there any important disease that is causing my symptom? If so, can it be treated? If not, can we discern why I can’t cope with this episode?”

Read the entire piece. And then get on with coping!

Fulbright’s tough week

FJlogo.gifIt has not been a week to remember for the venerable Houston law firm, Fulbright & Jaworski.
First, the firm’s expected public relations coup in hiring Harris County Judge Robert Eckels as a lobbyist with the firm was met with more than a little grumbling locally, forcing Eckels to address the question of why on earth he didn’t resign before last November’s election so that the voters could elect his successor? Eckels proceeded to sound oddly out of sorts in his subsequent public attempts to answer that quite reasonable question.
But that letdown was peanuts compared to the potential public relations disaster reported in this AboveTheLaw post:

Breaking: Fulbright & Jaworski Partner Drops the N-Bomb During A Recruiting Interview!
The email reprinted below, from Dean Katharine T. Bartlett, just went out to everyone at Duke Law School. It was forwarded to us by a source at the school.
Yes, we know: the partner who pulled a Michael Richards used “the n word” in the context of telling a story, in which the racial epithet was uttered by a character in the story. He didn’t use “the n word” to refer to any student or interviewee.
We don’t know the nature of the story being told by the partner. But unless the story was about, say, the partner’s pro bono representation, in a civil action for damages, of a hate crime or police brutality victim who was attacked and called “the n word,” it was hugely inappropriate for the partner to use a racial slur in this context (or, for that matter, any other context).

The post goes on to quote the Duke Law Dean’s entire email about the incident in its humiliating entirety, which is now all over the blogosphere. And the extensive comments to the post are interesting, to say the least.
But wait a minute. It turns out that there is more than a little context to the story. The above post was followed by this explanation from the Fulbright executive committee:

Dear Colleagues:
Because you may hear about or be asked about a recent situation at a law school where attorneys participated in training interviews of students, we want to bring it to your attention. One of our lawyers recounted a story about Leon Jaworskiís defense of an African-American man in a murder trial in Waco, Texas in the 1920s. During the retelling, in an effort to display the depth of racial hostility that Jaworski and his client faced, the attorney used a racial term that characterized what the district attorney in the case said about the defendant. After review of the situation, all involved concluded that such terms, although recounted without ill intentions, are inappropriate for our firm, which values diversity and strives for inclusiveness.
We are addressing the situation, and Steve Pfeiffer and other senior partners are en route to meet with the students. One of the other attorneys who participated in the training session acted immediately when the incident was called to his attention and responded with an electronic letter of explanation and appropriate apology. Any inquiries should be directed to the firm’s Hiring Partner, Gerry Lowry.
Executive Committee

And to make matters even more interesting, it appears that some members of the Duke Law School Faculty were stoking the fires. AboveTheLaw.com received the following email from a current law student at Duke:

This partner was relating what another person said in the context of telling a story. Now everyone is piling on him. The student [who voiced the complaint] has been goaded on by some super liberal professors.

H’mm. I wonder if any of those Duke law professors were the same ones who also supported the lynch mob in the Duke lacrosse team case?
My sense is that this all blows over quickly for Fulbright because, in the end, the Duke Law School Dean made a mountain out of molehill. But man, what a way to end a week that I’m sure the firm expected to be a public relations bonanza. Such is life in the big city.
Update: The Texas Lawyer ($) posted this online article on the incident today.

Dan Jenkins on Darrell Royal

darrell%20Royal%20022407.jpgThe Chronicle’s David Barron uses last night’s Texas Children’s Hospital fund-raising dinner to honor legendary former University of Texas football coach Darrell Royal as a Texas Legend to pen this fun article on two Clear Thinkers favorites — Coach Royal and Dan Jenkins. Barron includes the following gem from Jenkins comparing how Longhorn fans felt about Coach Royal versus how fans of two other top programs felt about their coaches of that era:

As a writer for newspapers in Fort Worth and Dallas and later for Sports Illustrated, Dan Jenkins, got to see all of the great coaches at work. Royal, Jenkins said, had a unique relationship to Texas and Texans, especially when compared to contemporaries like Woody Hayes at Ohio State or John McKay at USC.
“Darrell’s association with the Longhorn fans was more intimate,” Jenkins wrote in a recent e-mail. “Darrell had good buddies in all the other towns. Woody was standoffish, gruff, and stayed out of the public eye. Most Buckeyes respected him but never got to know him.
“McKay once told me he wasn’t revered by USC alums. They expected him to win. When McKay won his first national championship for the Trojans in ’62, I asked him how he was rewarded, and he said some people got together and bought him a new set of tires.”

Barron also passes along the following Jenkins anecdote about the UT sports information director during the Royal era, Jones Ramsey:

Royal was particularly gifted in the care and feeding of the Fourth Estate, with a little help from the Longhorns’ sports information director ó the late Jones Ramsey, the self-styled “World’s Tallest Fat Man.”
“I fondly recall the first time Jones took two or three of us to El Rancho for lunch,” Jenkins said. “Somebody asked him if it was any good, and Jones said, ‘Is it good? You go in the front and eat the dinner and go out the back and eat the garbage.’ It was the kind of thing Darrell probably said first.”

However, for my money, the best anecdote about Coach Royal was the one that UT women’s basketball coach Jody Conradt told several years ago during another fund-raising dinner. Former Chronicle sportswriter Mickey Herskowitz was there and passed along Conradt’s story:

But the [speaker] who stole the show was Jody Conradt, the Hall of Famer who gave the Longhorns a national championship in women’s basketball.
“They built the Erwin Center 21 years ago,” she said, “and obviously it never occurred to anyone that the women would need a separate locker room. So every room in this place had urinals in it.
“Now we have one of our own. Before one of our games, coach Darrell Royal was kind enough to speak to my team. Before he left, someone asked what the biggest difference was between our locker room and all the ones he knew from all his years of coaching. Coach Royal said:

‘Offhand, I can’t remember anyone ironing anything before a game in one of our locker rooms.’ “

Update: Barron follows up his article with this blog post on the dinner.

Off to the Advanced Business Bankruptcy Conference

Business%20Bankruptcy%20Course%20pic.gifI’m buzzing up to downtown Dallas for the day to participate in the State Bar of Texas CLE’s 25th Annual Advanced Business Bankruptcy Conference at the Adolphus Hotel. If you happen to be in downtown Dallas today and have some free time, then come on by and say hello and perhaps even take in a part of the conference. This is consistently one of the State Bar’s best prepared and most informative continuing legal education programs.
The conference brochure is here, and the updated outline for my talk — Business Bankruptcy Blogs — is here.

Observations of the Week

comments.gifTwo observations from earlier in the week resonated with me.
First, in this post, Jane Galt made the following pithy observation about the fallacy of reliance on governmental regulation:

“The post below also applies to behavioural economics, which the left seems to believe is a magical proof of the benevolence of government intervention, because after all, people are stupid, so they need the government to protect them from themselves. My take is a little subtler than that:
1) People are often stupid
2) Bureaucrats are the same stupid people, with bad incentives.”

Then, during his monologue on Tuesday night’s Tonight Show, Jay Leno observed the following about the cable television news networks’ fascination (obsession?) with certain recent news events:

“Well, the big story in the news is that Britney Spears shaved her head. Can you believe this? Legitimate news organizations are actually breaking into their Anna Nicole Smith coverage to tell you this.”

Cancer Diva

Terry%20Hayes.JPG“My name is Terry, and I’m dying of cancer. Welcome to the adventure.”
That is the welcome to the Houston Chronicle’s newest blog — CancerDiva. Terry Hayes, the author of the blog, describes herself as follows:

I’m a single, 40-year-old woman living in Houston with my sister and her two dogs. I have a kitty cat named Sasha. I love to shop, read, watch movies and listen to music. I enjoy a challenging jigsaw puzzle, “This American Life” and “Prairie Home Companion”. I like plays, traveling, and art cars. I love my job and my co-workers. I can’t get enough of “CSI,” “Law & Order,” or “The Closer,” and I’ll watch anything on BRAVO. My favorite color is pink.
Oh, and I’m dying of cancer.
No use sugarcoating it. When my oncologist told me in April 2006 that I have metastatic colon cancer, I nodded my head and said, “Okay.” When she told me I had about 24 months to live, “give or take a few,” I nodded my head and said, “Okay.”
My cancer had spread from my colon to distant sites in my body, namely my ovaries, liver and abdominal wall. Last week, I thought I might have a brain tumor. Luckily, my MRI was normal (normal for now anyway).
Only 5-8% of patients with Stage IV/Duke’s D colon cancer make it five years after diagnosis. The usual course, from diagnosis to death, takes about 24 months, “give or take a few”.
I’m not sure why I took the news quite so casually. My oncologist, a wonderful woman named Dr. Glover, said I was “eerily calm.”
I have a few theories. One of the many, many issues I’ll be discussing in this blog.

You can bet I’ll be reading this one.

Cool graphs

From the latest report of the Congressional Budget Office. HT to Greg Mankiw.
entitlements%20graph.gif
Robert Samuelson on the Stubborn Welfare State and the shifting priorities of the federal budget.
shifting%20priorities.jpg
Finally, Nielson Media Research’s television ratings for the post-season college football games from this past season. HT to Wizard of Odds.
Bowlchart11%20graph.jpg

The dark world of binge eating

binge%20eating.gifJane Brody is the longtime New York Times fitness and nutrition writer and I have admired her writing for many years. Her column from yesterday — titled “Out of Control: A True Story of Binge Eating” — is a must-read not only because it addresses an important health problem, but also because it has a compelling personal touch:

It was 1964, I was 23 and working at my first newspaper job in Minneapolis, 1,250 miles from my New York home. My love life was in disarray, my work was boring, my boss was a misogynist. And I, having been raised to associate love and happiness with food, turned to eating for solace.
Of course, I began to gain weight and, of course, I periodically went on various diets to try to lose what Iíd gained, only to relapse and regain all Iíd lost and then some.
My many failed attempts included the Drinking Manís Diet, popular at the time, which at least enabled me to stay connected with my hard-partying colleagues.
Before long, desperation set in. When I found myself unable to stop eating once Iíd started, I resolved not to eat during the day. Then, after work and out of sight, the bingeing began.
I learned where the few all-night mom-and-pop shops were located so I could pick up the eveningís supply on my way home from work. Then I would spend the night eating nonstop, first something sweet, then something salty, then back to sweet, and so on. A half-gallon of ice cream was only the beginning. I was capable of consuming 3,000 calories at a sitting. Many mornings I awakened to find partly chewed food still in my mouth.
And, as you might expect, because I didnít purge (never even heard of it then), I got fatter and fatter until I had gained a third more than my normal body weight, even though I was physically active.
My despair was profound, and one night in the midst of a binge I became suicidal. I had lost control of my eating; it was controlling me, and I couldnít go on living that way.
Fortunately, I was still rational enough to reach out for help, and at 2 a.m. I called a psychologist I knew at his home. His willingness to see me in the morning got me through the night.

Read the entire column. Brody’s honest and forthright story of how she finally came to terms with her obsession and addressed it — abandoning diets and embracing sound nutritional principles for her life — provides a hopeful and practical guide for those who are afflicted with this disorder. It is a stark reflection of the state of nutrition in the U.S. today that most of us know someone who is currently grappling with the same problem that Brody overcame.

Knight on the regulation of basketball players

bobby_knight_intrvw122007.jpgSay what you will about Texas Tech basketball coach Bobby Knight, but he knows what he is talking about in regard to making college basketball a true intercollegiate sport:

While most college basketball coaches would jump at the chance for a one-year player like Texas freshman sensation Kevin Durant, Texas Tech coach Bob Knight said Monday he would not do so.
In fact, the coach said Monday that he thinks the NBA’s mandate of at least a year of college for high school graduates is bad for the college game.
“I think it’s the worst thing that’s happened to college basketball since I’ve been coaching,” Knight said Monday.
A year ago, the NBA made the decision that players have to attend college for at least one year after graduation from high school. That decision has exposed players such as Ohio State freshman center Greg Oden and Durant ó two players who would have been lottery picks last year and will likely be the first two players chosen in this year’s draft if they decide to leave after one year ó to the college game for what seems to be just one year.
Knight’s primary concern seems to be that the NBA’s mandate allows student-athletes to get around being true students in college.
“Because now you can have a kid come to school for a year, play basketball and he doesn’t even have to go to class,” Knight said. “He certainly doesn’t have to go to class the second semester. I’m not exactly positive about the first semester, but he would not have to attend a single class the second semester to play through the whole second semester of basketball.
“That I think has a tremendous effect on the integrity of college sports. I think what should happen is a kid can come out of high school and go to the NBA and if they chose to put him in the developmental league, fine. But if he goes to college there has to be an agreement that he is not eligible for the draft until after two years of college. That way the kid has to obtain eligibility and then he has to retain eligibility and at least for those two years he is a college student. Now the kid is simply like a hired player.”
Knight said there would never be a scenario where he would knowingly recruit a player who intended to play college basketball for one year.

Again, the “rent-a-player” situation that Coach Knight is talking about is the result of the NBA’s needless regulation, which once again foists upon the universities the risk of subsidizing the NBA’s minor league farm system. As noted here, the colleges have a model already established in baseball that would create the free choice for players that would transform college basketball into a truer form of intercollegiate competition. With the proliferation of minor professional basketball leagues overseas, there really is no legitimate reason to restrict a young player’s access to professional basketball or to force him to fake being a college student while playing a year of minor league ball in the U.S. Let basketball players make the same choice that baseball players have coming out of high school — either play in a professional league or accept the benefits of a college education for a few years in return for competing intercollegiately. Not only will it make Coach Knight much happier, but it is the right thing to do for the players.

Is Jose de Jesus Ortiz Brad Ausmus’ press agent?

ausmus4.jpgWe already know that the Chronicle’s beat writer for the Stros — Jose de Jesus Ortiz — is not very good at evaluating baseball players. But this puff piece out of the box this year on the Stros’ chronic albatross — Brad Ausmus — is lacking in objectivity even by de Jesus Ortiz’s dubious standards:

With two spots up for grabs at the back end of the rotation, the Astros will need Ausmus to help those pitchers settle into the majors.[. . .]
Ausmus was just as valuable to veteran stars such as Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte when they switched over to the NL after spending their careers in the American League. [. . .]
Ausmus may be many things, but idiot is not one of them. He’s witty, a voracious reader and a charismatic leader.
He’s likely the most respected person in the clubhouse, riding both sides of the divide that usually separates position players from the pitchers.
“He does a great job behind the plate,” said Garner. “He’s another one of the veteran guys that adds stability on the field for us. But he really runs the pitching staff real well. Pitchers have confidence in him. They trust him. [. . .]
Some fans are critical of Ausmus’ production at the plate. A career .253 hitter, he hit .230 with 16 doubles, one triple, two home runs and 39 RBIs last season.
If the middle of the Astros’ offense had been more productive, Ausmus’ batting average would hardly have been an issue. The catcher’s position isn’t generally an offensive one.
Nonetheless, Ausmus takes pride in his hitting. He’s prone to let off steam throughout the year after a poor at-bat. His value to the team, however, was recognized when opposing coaches and managers voted him the 2006 National League Rawlings Gold Glove.
“I’m not really sure what my role is, per se,” he said. “I know that a catcher has the most dramatic effect on the team on the defensive side of the ball as opposed to the offensive side of the ball.”
The Astros know that, too. It’s why they appreciate Ausmus so much.

So, it’s the fault of the Stros hitters batting in the middle of the lineup that Ausmus’ horrible hitting is so evident? And what is this about the catcher position not being “an offensive one?” Last time I looked, the rules of baseball still required the catcher to hit. Only the Stros’ inexplicable attachment to “catch and throw” catchers such as Ausmus has rendered the position the black hole of outs in the Stros’ lineup.
Ausmus may be the baseball equivalent of Peyton Manning calling a game from behind the plate, but that doesn’t change the fact that Ausmus is the worst hitter in Stros franchise history. As I noted in my evaluation of Stros players after last season:

Brad Ausmus: F Ausmus (-38 RCAA/.308 OBA/.285 SLG/.593 OPS) took his level of poor play to new depths during the 2006 season as he had the worst season of hitting in Stros history:
Stros season worst RCAA 100906.gif
Ausmus is also far and away the worst hitter in Stros history:
Stros season worst career RCAA 100906.gif
Given that Ausmus is not even a particularly good defensive player anymore (his arm is no longer strong enough to throw out basestealers consistently), there is no justification for Ausmus remaining a regular Major League player. The only reason he received an F rather than an F- is that he blocks pitches well.

There is really no valid reason for the Stros to maintain a roster spot for Ausmus at this point; he is far worse than a replacement-level player. If he is such a good influence to have around the clubhouse, then the Stros should hire him as a bullpen coach. But paying the worst hitter in Stros history $4 million smackeroos this season to cost the club runs does not make any sense. No matter how hard de Jesus Ortiz tries to make sense of it.
Update: The Chronicle’s Richard Justice expresses an opinion of me shared by my teenage daughters.