Ramping up the blame game

Blanco.jpgAs noted here earlier, I don’t think it’s the time to point fingers at each other while there are still people to be saved inside New Orleans, although I do think the question of why troops were not used earlier to re-establish civil order is a reasonable one.
However, among the early analysis of what went wrong with the various governmental responses to the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, this Washington Post article makes it clear that the Bush Administration is not going to take all the blame for various shortcomings:

Behind the scenes, a power struggle emerged, as federal officials tried to wrest authority from Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D). Shortly before midnight Friday, the Bush administration sent her a proposed legal memorandum asking her to request a federal takeover of the evacuation of New Orleans, a source within the state’s emergency operations center said Saturday.
The administration sought unified control over all local police and state National Guard units reporting to the governor. Louisiana officials rejected the request after talks throughout the night, concerned that such a move would be comparable to a federal declaration of martial law. Some officials in the state suspected a political motive behind the request. “Quite frankly, if they’d been able to pull off taking it away from the locals, they then could have blamed everything on the locals,” said the source, who does not have the authority to speak publicly.
A senior administration official said that Bush has clear legal authority to federalize National Guard units to quell civil disturbances under the Insurrection Act and will continue to try to unify the chains of command that are split among the president, the Louisiana governor and the New Orleans mayor.

As one my former professors used to remind me, “they fiddle while Rome burns and, to make matters worse, they do not realize that Rome is burning or that they are fiddling.”
Meanwhile, this City Journal article is a pretty darn astute analysis of what happened last weekend in New Orleans. Hat tip to Tom Smith over at the Right Coast for the City Journal piece.

A massive relief effort that you do not see

astrodome inside.jpgAs Americans are still attempting to absorb the shock of the largest exodus of citizens during our nation’s modern history, the Chronicle’s Steve Campbell’s great photo of the inside of Houston’s Astrodome provides the backdrop to a huge part of the Hurricane Katrina relief effort that you do not see on television — the massive effort by a network of Houston-area churches and charities to provide relief resources to the tens of thousands of Gulf Coast evacuees who are residing in hotels and homes throughout Houston and Texas.

Continue reading

Updating Katrina’s economic ripples

refinery.sunset.web2.jpgSix days after Hurricane Katrina hammered a main conduit of the U.S. energy and shipping industries, much of the crucial infrastructure on the energy industry in the Gulf Coast region those remains shut down. Although a full assessment of the status of the region’s infrastructure still cannot be made because of the post-storm chaos, it is becoming increasingly clear that refining and production capacity in the region will be curtailed for a prolonged period of time. Earlier posts on the developing economic effects of Katrina over the past week are here, here, here, here, here and here.
First, the impact on refining capacity. The storm shut down about two million barrels a day of crude-oil refining capacity. That translates to the loss of about one million barrels a day of gasoline production, which is about 10% of total U.S. demand. It is now apparent that at least four refineries that together generate about 5% of U.S. oil-refining capacity will be down for at least a month as those facilities are repaired. Meanwhile, damage to production capacity has also been extensive. Although production is coming back on-line slowly, it’s becoming clearer that it will take at least several weeks — and perhaps months — for production levels to return to near pre-Katrina levels.

Continue reading

Robert Reich on the dangers of the political economy status quo

reich.jpgRobert B. Reich is University Professor and Maurice B. Hexter Professor of Social and Economic Policy at Brandeis University and at the Brandeis Heller School of Social Policy and Management. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton Administration. Daniel Drezner points us to this NY Times op-ed in which Mr. Reich provides a fine analysis of the dangerous economic effects of the seemingly intractable governmental tendencies toward protectionism and pork-barrel spending:

Continue reading

Chief Justice William Rehnquist, R.I.P.

Rehnquist.jpgChief Justice William H. Rehnquist‘s death Saturday night creates a second vacancy on the Supreme Court and raises the stakes in what will likely be an intense political battle over the Supreme Court’s future.
Over the next days and weeks, many Supreme Court commentators more knowledgeable than I will place Chief Justice Rehnquist’s judicial career in perspective (four good previous ones are here, here, here and here), so I will pass along the best of those commentaries. However, one thing is clear at this point: Chief Justice Rehnquist will be remembered — along with John Marshall and Earl Warren — as one of the Supreme Court’s three most influential Chief Justices.
Chief Justice Rehnquist’s death comes less than a month before his 81st birthday, only three months after the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and just days before hearings on a former clerk of Justice Rehnquist, John Roberts, who President Bush nominated to replace Justice O’Connor. Judge Roberts confirmation hearing is currently scheduled to open Tuesday, but it likely will be delayed as a result of Justice Rehnquist’s death.

Continue reading