Robert B. Reich is University Professor and Maurice B. Hexter Professor of Social and Economic Policy at Brandeis University and at the Brandeis Heller School of Social Policy and Management. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton Administration. Daniel Drezner points us to this NY Times op-ed in which Mr. Reich provides a fine analysis of the dangerous economic effects of the seemingly intractable governmental tendencies toward protectionism and pork-barrel spending:

Oil shocks, hurricanes and housing bubbles aside, consumers who are worried about their jobs and wages will be reluctant to buy goods and services, thereby dampening any recovery. But the new insecurity is undermining our national interest in other, less predictable ways by setting off political resistance to economic change, with negative repercussions that ripple beyond the economy.
Forty years ago, free-trade agreements passed Congress with broad backing because legislators recognized that they helped American consumers and promoted global stability. But as job and wage insecurity have grown, public support for free trade has declined. The North American Free Trade Agreement, which passed by 34 votes in 1993, was a hard sale for the Clinton administration. But the recent Central American Free Trade Agreement, embracing a far smaller and less populous area, was an even harder sale for President Bush. Despite Republican control of Congress, the trade deal cleared the House in July by just two votes, and then only after heavy White House pressure.
The increasing insecurity of ordinary workers also imperils our national defense by handcuffing the Pentagon. It can’t shift the defense budget to fighting terrorism because of local fears that well-paying jobs will be lost. Contrast this with the comparative ease by which the Pentagon downshifted from fighting World War II to the Cold War, more than 50 years ago. Its recent base-closing recommendations ignited a political firestorm, causing even the apolitical Base Closure and Realignment Commission to retreat. The commission’s chairman justified its decision to save the Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, for example, by noting that the base “is the second-largest employer in western New York.”
Consider, finally, the pork that’s been larded into the federal budget. Republicans may collectively oppose wasteful spending, but as individual legislators they’ve created more pork than any Congress in history. The new $286 billion transportation act is bloated with 6,371 “special projects” with a price tag some $30 billion more than the White House wanted. The president reassured the nation that it would, at the least, “give hundreds of thousands of Americans good-paying jobs.” The new $12.3 billion energy bill cost twice what the White House sought because it’s laden with what Senator Pete Domenici, the New Mexico Republican who ushered it through Congress, defends as measures to create “hundreds of thousands of jobs.” According to the conservative watchdog group Citizens Against Government Waste, pork programs have risen from fewer than 2,000 a year in the mid-1990’s to almost 14,000 this year.

Read the entire piece, which includes several of Mr. Reich’s policy alternatives, such as expansion of the earned income tax credit, which is the modern equivalent of the negative income tax that Milton Friedman introduced in his 1962 classic Capitalism and Freedom to provide welfare in the most efficient manner possible. Moreover, Mr. Reich’s view toward the Pentagon’s intransigence in continuing to feed sacred cows has been well-chronicled in Robert Coram’s book, Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War in which he describes the Pentagon’s resistance to Mr. Boyd and his acolytes’ efforts in revolutioning the way in which the American military approaches war in the late 20th and early 21st century.