Another Underachieving Enron Task Force Alum Rings the Bell

Fresh off his victory in the Joseph Nacchio trial, former Enron Task Force prosecutor Cliff Stricklin is the latest former Enron Task Force prosecutor to land a cush job at a big firm. Sean Berkowitz and Andrew Weissmann, among other Task Force prosecutors, cashed in earlier.

The puff piece announcing Stricklin’s new job left out a few details of his work with the Enron Task Force. Stricklin was one of the lead prosecutors during the first Enron Broadband trial in which the Task Force was caught eliciting false testimony from one of the Task Force’s main witnesses (Ken Rice) and threatening two defense-friendly witnesses, Beth Stier and Lawrence Ciscon.

During the trial, U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore angrily cut off Stricklin from further cross-examination of one of the defendants and rebuked him in open court when Stricklin violated one of the Judge’s limine orders.

That trial — which appeared to be a tap-in for the Task Force at the outset — ended in a crushing defeat for the Task Force. Stricklin parleyed his work in the Broadband case into a role on the prosecution team in the Lay-Skilling trial, where he proceeded to give a lesson in what not to ask on re-direct. That performance led to his appointment as the lead prosecutor in the Naccio case.

So, as Jeff Skilling fights for freedom from what amounts to a barbaric life sentence and many other lives have been shattered by the work of the Enron Task Force, the folks who cut corners to achieve those results are doing quite well, thank you.

Given the dismal track record and the dubious tactics of the Enron Task Force, it makes one wonder just what these big law firms would have offered up to former Task Force members if they had done a really good job?

The Dear Abby of business

Lucy.jpgLucy Kellaway, Financial Times columnist and associate editor, pens an entertaining blog called Dear Lucy in which she solicits letters from businesspeople about various business problems. Sometimes she comments on them, but all the time she opens them up to reader comments, which range between the insightful, hilarious and bizarre. The following is last week’s letter:

I recently submitted an expense report following a routine trip to Frankfurt. Instead of attaching the total bill, I mistakenly attached a fully itemised printout. Unfortunately, this was returned to me, copied to my boss, with one item ñ ìPrivate Room Entertainment: Adults Only Movieî ñ highlighted as an illegitimate business expense. I ordered the film more out of curiosity than habit and am usually meticulous over my expenses. I work in the finance department and am a loyal and trusted employee. The form was seen by my secretary, though, and I am anxious that it may become a topic of conversation with her lunchtime colleagues. How do I salvage the situation?
Manager, Male, 43

The following was one reader’s advice:

“Go to work tomorrow dressed as a lady. It’s sure to deflect from any comments made.”

Why betting against Pete Maravich in H-O-R-S-E was not a good idea