Warning labels?

Enron%20stock%20price.gifRemember when the various credit-rating agencies contended that their relatively sanguine ratings of Enron’s debt up until the company went belly-up were the result of the company’s misrepresentations? One of the more ludicrous allegations was that the rating agencies didn’t understand the true nature of such relatively common structured finance transactions as derivative pre-pay transactions. Yeah, right.
Fast forward a few years and get a load of this W$J article:

In an acknowledgment that the system it used to rate billions of dollars of mortgage-related securities was potentially flawed, Moody’s Corp. said it is considering a new way of rating those and other sometimes-volatile structured finance vehicles.
The credit-rating firm is considering an overhaul of its rating procedures that could include new labels to help investors distinguish collateralized debt obligations and other structured-finance investments from corporate bonds and Treasury securities. . .
More broadly, the ratings firm is trying to decide whether to add warning labels that essentially acknowledge the limitations of its ratings.

Warning labels on highly-volatile structured finance investment vehicles? Barry Ritholtz has some fun with that one.

Are they finally getting serious?

Continental%20Airlines%20logo%20020708.jpgThe Wall Street Journal ($) reported yesterday afternoon that Houston-based Continental Airlines seemingly perpetual merger negotiations (see also here) with Chicago-based United Airlines are accelerating for a variety of reasons. A Continental-United deal is contingent on Northwest Airlines’ ongoing merger negotiations with Delta Airlines because Northwest currently owns the right to block a Continental merger. However, that right evaporates if Northwest merges with Delta.
Whether all of this is the product of rational thought or irrational exuberance remains is another issue. As noted recently here and many other times on this blog, the airline industry is a mess overall and combining two large airlines does not necessarily provide any meaningful competitive benefit. Continental performed in the middle of the airline industry last year, doing reasonably well financially and operationally, but ranking ninth-worst in terms of frequency of bumping customers from flights. Only Delta was worse at bumping customers among the major carriers.
United, on the other hand, has been a basket case for years. In its first full year of operations after emerging from its long bankruptcy case, United’s earnings were among the worst in the industry last year (only JetBlue’s were worse). Moreover, United struggled with operations, ranking seventh in on-time percentage after a disastrous December that included numerous cancellations and delays. Meanwhile, United’s rate of customer complaints was second-worst, ahead of only US Airways, as Professor Bainbridge would attest.
So, what to make of all this? At this point, it’s hard to say, other than management of both airlines are probably betting that the biggest airlines have the best chance of survival when the inevitable shakeout of the industry finally is allowed to happen (chronic reorganizations of distressed airlines have delayed that process up to now).
Color me as skeptical.

The importance of recruiting classes

football%20player.gifThe institutionalized fanaticism that is college football recruiting reached its annual zenith yesterday as hundreds of the nation’s best high school senior football players signed National Letters of Intent with various big-time college football programs. It never fails to amaze me how much interest the competition between big-time college programs for 17 and 18 year-olds generates among the supporters of those programs.
But as this earlier post noted, there is no doubt that it is important to the success of the programs. For example, over the past decade, the respective programs of the University of Texas and Texas A&M have mostly been going in the opposite direction, UT up and A&M down. This Suzanne Halliburton/Austin-American Statesman article reviews the past ten UT recruiting classes, while Ryan over at TAMABINP does the same here with regard to A&M’s recruiting classes over the same period. As noted earlier here, A&M remains well a decided step below UT in the overall quality of its recruiting classes.
By the way, this website developed by three Stetson School of Business and Economics at Mercer University economists contains information about an econometric football recruiting model that predicts the collegiate choices of high school football players. Check it out.