An investment market for Charlie Pallilo

TRADING%20floor%20042007.jpgMy favorite sports talk radio show in Houston is Charlie Pallilo‘s afternoon show over at 790-AM, but I’ve always wondered why the quite bright Pallilo isn’t off making millions trading bonds or running a hedge fund. Moneyball’s Michael Lewis reports in this CondeNast Portfolio article about a market that is right up Pallilo’s alley — investing in professional athletes:

Wall Street is about to launch a new way to trade professional athletes the way you trade stocks. A piece of Tiger, anyone?
When financial historians look back and ask why it took Wall Street so long to create the first public stock market that trades in professional athletes, they will see ours as an age of creative ferment. Theyíll see a new, extremely well-financed company in Silicon Valley that, for the moment, sells itself as a fantasy sports site but aims to become, as its co-founder Mike Kerns puts it, ìthe first real stock market in athletes.î . . . The athlete would sell 20 percent of all future on-field or on-court earnings to a trust, which would, in turn, sell securities to the public. Theyíll also single out the birth of the first European hedge fund that runs a multimillion-dollar portfolio of professional soccer players, the value of which rises and falls with the playersí performances.
As a number of smart people seem to have noticed at once, professional athletes have all the traits of successful publicly traded stocks, beginning with enormous speculative interest in them. Americans wager somewhere between $200 billion and $400 billion a year on sports, and between 15 million and 25 million of them play in fantasy leaguesówhich is to say that a shadow stock market in athletes already exists. That market may not know everything there is to know about the athletes it values, but it probably knows more than New York Stock Exchange investors know about the N.Y.S.E.ís public corporations. ìPeople worry about lack of transparency in sports,î says the leading sports agent. ìMy newspaper this morning has two and a half pages of business news and 17 pages of sports. The day after the game, you know Peyton Manningís thumb is hurt. What do you know about the C.E.O. of I.B.M.?î

Let’s see now. You will soon be able to place a legal bet on a professional athlete over the Internet, but not on the outcome of a game?

The targetor becomes the target

O%27Quinn%20041907.gifFamed Houston plaintiffs’ lawyer John O’Quinn is used to doing the targeting in the lawsuits in which he is involved. But in the bizarre world of litigation swirling around the estate of the late Anna Nicole Smith, O’Quinn has become the target.
Howard K. Stern, a former attorney and companion of Smith, filed the defamation suit on April 13 against O’Quinn in federal district court in the Southern District of Florida. Stern bases his lawsuit on allegedly defamatory statements that O’Quinn made to the media while representing Smith’s mother in connection with litigation in Florida and the Bahamas that erupted after Smith’s death from a drug overdose earlier this year. Stern is alleging defamation and false light/invasion of privacy causes of action against O’Quinn, taking dead aim at O’Quinn’s multi-hundred million dollar net worth. This press release was issued by Stern’s lawyer, L. Lin Wood, a lawyer out of of Atlanta.
In the event this one makes it to trial (highly doubtful, in my view), it sounds ready made for Court TV.

What would Miss Manners say?

breastfeeding.jpgTake a sick baby and an anxious mother;
Put them in a Ronald McDonald House waiting room in the Texas Medical Center with other patients and their relatives;
Add in that the mother decides to breastfeed the child in the waiting room;
Toss in a somewhat intolerant observor of the breastfeeding who registers a complaint about it, and
Presto!
All hell breaks loose.