An interesting economics debate

This week, Tyler Cowen of the Marginal Revolutions blog and Jon Irons of the Argmax.com blog will be debating various economics issues over at the Economics page of the on-line Wall Street Journal, WSJ.com. The Journal page is usually gated for use of paying customers only, but for this week it is open to all visitors.
The first discussion concerns social security privatization. On Tuesday comes outsourcing and trade, followed by the future of Europe and China. Tyler is far more persuasive in the first installment on Social Security, in which Mr. Irons largely ignores the costs of the current Social Security system while waxing eloquent about its hard to value benefits.
Check it the debate this week as it should be interesting.

The Rovenian Candidate

Professor Ribstein of Ideoblog — whose broad expertise in business law includes extensive knowledge on how business is portrayed in cinemacontinues development here of a sure-fire winning screenplay on how President Bush won the 2004 election. Enjoy.

Euro reaction to America’s new Ryder Cup captain

From the complaining contained in this London Telegraph op-ed, it sounds as if the PGA of America may have finally chosen the right captain in Tom Lehman to revive America’s flagging Ryder Cup fortunes:

Lehman’s record in the Ryder Cup is statistically good – won five, lost three, halved two – but behaviourally bad.
In 1995, at Oak Hill, Lehman was a rookie and he was first out in the singles against Seve Ballesteros. On the 12th hole Seve asked Lehman to mark his ball, but instead the American tapped in his short putt. This, of course, was pounced on by Ballesteros, who said: “What are you doing? You play out of turn. Where is the referee?” The crowd then began booing and Lehman became unjustifiably angry. He was in the wrong. . .
[F]our years later at Brookline, Lehman was involved in a series of inexcusable incidents. On the second afternoon he holed a putt and indulged in all manner of vertical fist-pumping while Darren Clarke still had to hole out. Later on in the match, he looked on while his playing partner drove off before Clarke and Lee Westwood had arrived on the tee.
But Lehman saved the worst for the final afternoon. Before his singles against Westwood he began conducting the crowd in a reprise of God Bless America. He literally ran off the 13th green after holing a putt and began high-fiving the spectators. And then he led the infamous charge across the 17th green when Jose Maria Olazabal still had his putt to keep the match alive.
Perhaps most unforgiveable of all, Lehman has never properly apologised for any of this. It only required a letter saying he had become caught up in the exuberance of the moment, but that was no excuse and he apologised unreservedly for his conduct. Lehman couldn’t bring himself to write such a letter and so he will always be haunted by Sam Torrance’s charge of, “calls himself a man of God. That was the most disgraceful thing I have ever seen”. . .
. . . Lehman should never have been appointed captain. His behaviour at Brookline and subsequent unwillingness to apologise should have disqualified him for eternity. The PGA’s refusal to recognise these facts shows either they are out of touch with the rest of the world or too desperate and arrogant to care.

Come on, Brits. No American Ryder Cup captain has ever come close to the absurdly bad behavior of European captain Ballesteros during the 1997 Ryder Cup competition. Lighten up.

The politics of tax policy

This NY Times article reviews the growing consensus within the Bush Administration that something needs to be done with the federal government’s absurdly complex and special interest-riddled income tax system. There is no real economic analysis of the alternatives here, just a review of the political implications of such a movement. The most hopeful quote in the article comes from a Democrat:

“It strikes me that there’s consensus in the country, and hopefully in Washington, that the tax system is too complex, that it’s full of loopholes that are exploited by special interests and that we need to simplify them,” said Senator-elect Barack Obama of Illinois, a Democrat who won easy election to an open seat.
Mr. Obama, speaking on “This Week” on ABC, said, “If we can arrive at a tax simplification agenda that is not resulting in a shift toward a more regressive tax system, but is instead genuinely making it simpler for ordinary Americans to file their tax returns without a lot of paperwork and gobbledygook, then I think that’s something we could work together on.”

Amen.

Trying to avoid living like a poor student at 70

Ben Stein writes this personal finance op-ed for the NY Sunday Times in which he illuminates the mounting retirement finance problem that is confronting the Baby Boomer generation:

This is the bore of the gun pointed right between the eyes of the baby boomers. With the low interest rates of today and tomorrow, with the lavish way we have come to expect to live, with a stock market that is sluggish, let us say, what on earth are we going to do about retirement?
Unfortunately, this is not just a paranoid fantasy about my own life. This is going to be the reality of millions, maybe tens of millions of baby boomers unless they get their backsides into gear and make some serious changes in their lives.
You can look at it anecdotally, or you can look at it statistically. Anecdotally: If you are a woman in your mid-50’s living on a salary of $150,000 a year, and if you wish to maintain your living standard when you retire at age 65, you will need about $200,000 a year to live on, assuming inflation raises prices by 3 percent a year. If you assume you will get about $15,000 a year from Social Security, you will need about another $185,000 a year. To have that much income with today’s interest rates, you will probably need about $4.6 million in the bank. Do you have it?
Or, we can look at it statistically. About 77 million baby boomers are racing toward retirement. That’s people roughly between 40 and 60 years old. More than 34 percent of the ones over 55 report having financial savings (not counting their home equity) of less than $50,000. Only 21 percent have more than $100,000. The average Social Security benefit as of 2003 was only $895 a month. Only roughly one in eight workers as of 2001 had a pension with a defined benefit (as opposed to a defined contribution).
We can look at it another way. If you had to retire in 10 years with (now let’s be really generous here) twice the savings you now have, and would receive interest of 4 percent on it, how close would you be to having a living income, i.e. an income you could live on at your present style of life? Be honest.
You can look at it still another way. The average family in the New York area earns roughly (and I mean really roughly) $50,000 a year. You would need to have at least $1.25 million in principal to yield that income at 4 percent. Do you have it?

And the solution?

Major league retirement planning right here and now. Right this second. Make a plan with an adviser you trust and for whom you have gotten superb references. Make it a plan with a lot of diversification of stocks, bonds, mutual funds, foreign, domestic, emerging, variable annuities (but study them carefully – there are immense variations among them), real estate and even cash.
The plan has to allow for expensive, long-term medical care. It has to provide for the possibility of losing your job at some point before you reach retirement age. The plan cannot count on miracle cures from the federal government. The federal government is just a means of transferring money from wage earners to retirees – and the wage earners are not going to want to bankrupt themselves for the baby boomers (who got all of the good music anyway).

Read the entire piece.