This NY Times article reports on a potentially important development in the Enron-related criminal case against two former Enron executives and four Merrill Lynch executives dubbed the “Nigerian Barge case.” The Houston Chronicle story on these latest developments is here.
A day after the Enron Task Force had elected not to list former Enron CFO Andrew Fastow as a witness in the case, the Task Force advised the defendants that the government has in its possession potential exculpatory evidence for the defense relating to Mr. Fastow. Defendants immediately asked U.S. District Judge Ewing Werlein Thursday to conduct an evidentiary hearing to find out why prosecutors have withheld until the last minute evidence from Fastow that could help the defense.
According to the defense motion, in one FBI interview, Fastow said he did not even recall one of the defendants — former Enron finance executive Dan Boyle — being involved in Enron’s 1999 sale to Merrill Lynch of an interest in electricity-generating barges in Nigeria.
As noted in this earlier post, the government’s theory of the case is that Enron’s sale of an interest in the barges to Merrill was a sham and not a “true sale” for accounting purposes because Fastow orally promised Merrill in a secret side deal that Enron would either buy back the barges or broker a deal for them the following year. However, none of the deal documents contained that promise, and the the parties contirmed in the written documents that they were relying only on the representations and agreements contained in the written agreements between the parties. Fastow’s statements to the FBI and Justice that no such oral agreement existed could be strong evidence for the defense that the alleged side deal did not exist.
In a pre-trial conference last Thursday, Judge Werlein was openly skeptical about several of the prosecutors’ statements regarding why they had not turned over potentially exculpatory evidence in their possession to the defense. It will be interesting to see how this eminently fair Judge reacts to these latest developments.
Daily Archives: June 3, 2004
Growth of “Micropolis” communities
This Wall Street Journal ($) article reports on the growth of a certain type of community that is known as a “micropolis” — growing population centers of at least one town of 10,000 to 50,000 people removed by as much as 100 miles from the nearest large city that are drawing refugees both from rural America and suburbia. These communities offer some of the cultural attractions and conveniences of cities without the liabilities and headaches of urban sprawl. Not only has telecommuting and internet mail-ordering made it easier for folks in such communities to remain connected to trade and commerce from outlying areas, employers find it easier to open a factory or an office park because of lower real estate and labor costs.
UT regents elect James Huffines chairman
This Austin American-Statesman article reports on the University of Texas System Board of Regents selection of James Huffines, an Austin banker and behind-the-scenes Republican powerbroker, as chairman of the UT Board of Regents on Wednesday. Mr. Huffines succeeds Charles Miller, a retired Houston money manager, who resigned the chairmanship but will continue to serve as a regent until Governor Perry appoints his replacement.
Robert Durst bond amount struck down as unreasonable
The incredible murder case involving Robert Durst finally took an expected turn on Wednesday as the 14th Court of Appeals struck down state district Judge Susan Criss’ absurdly high $3 billion bond as a condition for Durst’s release pending his trial on evidence tampering and bail-jumping charges. The appellate court directed Judge Criss to conduct another hearing soon to reconsider the amount of the bond and provided guidelines for what it considered to be a reasonable amount of the bond.
Based on the outcome of Durst’s murder trial, if Durst’s attorney Dick DeGeurin could only get a jury trial on the issue of the amount of the bond, he might get Durst released on personal recognizance.