Navy Coach Johnson is not happy

Paul Johnson 122006.jpgThis previous post introduced Navy head football coach Paul Johnson, who is a throwback to an earlier era before media relations reps and banal press releases. Coach Johnson took some questions the other day as he prepares the Midshipman to play Boston College in the Meineke Car Care Bowl in Charlotte on Dec. 30:

Q: You seem a little perturbed. Can I ask you why?
Johnson: Yeah, we didn’t practice very well.
Q: You had told me originally that you would only go full pads the first couple of days, but it looks like you are going to do a little more full pad work.
Johnson: Yep. We will probably go full pads every day right up to the game.
Q: Why is that?
Johnson: We haven’t exactly practiced the way I thought we should.
Q: Anything in particular you’re seeing?
Johnson: We are lackadaisical and have no focus. Other than that it’s been OK.
Q: Does hitting wake them up a little bit?
Johnson: I don’t know. It hasn’t yet, but it makes me feel better. I can’t him them, but they can hit each other.[. . .]

A little more entertaining than the typical platitudes emanating from most head football coaches these days, don’t you think? Considering how he has turned the Navy program around, I cannot understand what Alabama is waiting for — Coach Johnson would be an instant hit at Bama.

The Brownback judicial litmus test fails

brownback.jpgThis previous post reported on the political posturing of Republican Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas, who was blocking a long-delayed judicial nomination by President Bush because the nominee had attended a commitment ceremony between a couple of gay friends. Well, Senator Brownback has finally backed off, but he still sounds demagogic even when he tries to do the right thing:

Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas, who blocked the confirmation of a woman to the federal bench because she attended a same-sex commitment ceremony for the daughter of her long-time neighbors, says he will now allow a vote on the nomination.
Mr. Brownback, a possible contender for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, said in a recent interview that when the Senate returned in January, he would allow a vote on Janet Neff, a 61-year-old Michigan state judge, who was nominated to a Federal District Court seat.
Mr. Brownback, who has been criticized for blocking the nomination, said he would also no longer press a proposed solution he offered on Dec. 8 that garnered even more criticism: that he would remove his block if Judge Neff agreed to recuse herself from all cases involving same-sex unions.
In an interview last week, Mr. Brownback said that he still believed Judge Neffís behavior raised serious questions about her impartiality and that he was likely to vote against her. But he said he did not realize his proposal ó asking a nominee to agree in advance to remove herself from deciding a whole category of cases ó was so unusual as to be possibly unprecedented. Legal scholars said it raised constitutional questions of separation of powers for a senator to demand that a judge commit to behavior on the bench in exchange for a vote.

Senator Brownback “did not realize” that his proposal violated the separation of powers upon which the federal government is based?

Epstein on Seton Hall’s “ethics”

handcuffs122006.jpgIt all started a couple of weeks ago when Richard A. Epstein wrote the op-ed discussed in this post in which he decries the deferred prosecution racquet that coerced Bristol Myers into making a “contribution” to fund an ethics endowment at the prosecutor’s law school, Seton Hall.
Professor Epstein’s piece prompted a response from Seton Hall Law Dean Patrick Hobbs, who contends essentially that the ethics program is for such a good purpose that the school can overlook the serious breach of ethics that was involved in funding the program in the first place.
As you might expect, Professor Epstein has the last word in this WSJ ($) letter to the editor:

My Nov. 28 editorial-page commentary “The Deferred Prosecution Racket” brought forth a spirited but wholly unconvincing response by Patrick E. Hobbs, dean of the Seton Hall Law School (“Fighting the Infection of Unethical Behavior in Corporate Culture,” Letters to the Editor, Dec. 8). Dean Hobbs defends his law school’s decision to accept money for a business ethics program pursuant to the deferred prosecution agreement between the U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, Christopher J. Christie, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. It is sheer naivetÔøΩ to assume that BMS and its attorneys signed on, as Dean Hobbs suggests, because of their deep belief that “the wrong corporate culture can become a breeding ground for unethical and criminal behavior.” There’s no way that BMS would have made that donation if freed from the risk of corporate prosecution. To avoid the taint, let Dean Hobbs raise money for a worthy project from one of thousands of New Jersey firms not faced with the threat of federal indictment.
If anything, his defense of the BMS-Seton Hall gift shows just how cancerous DPAs can be. Any good course in business ethics would stress the dangerous institutional incentives put in play if DPAs can direct payments to public charities. Let’s posit that Seton Hall did nothing whatsoever to urge Mr. Christie to funnel money to it through the DPA. No matter: Once this precedent is set, it’s open season for every public institution to lobby prosecutors for a piece of the action. Worse still, nothing prevents these organizations from quietly supporting criminal investigations to increase the likelihood of such windfalls. The public should not tolerate any arrangements that introduce these third-party influences into the prosecutor’s office. Any excellence of Mr. Christie as a prosecutor or of Seton Hall in ethics reform are tainted by this gift, which the law school should return forthwith.
The systemic problems with DPAs, unfortunately, cannot be solved by Timothy Coleman’s proposal (Letter, Dec. 8) to incorporate the various mitigating elements of DPA into the underlying criminal case. That approach will only clog criminal trials with matters wholly irrelevant to guilt or innocence. And it will fail to soften the present dire consequences from the threat of prosecution. Similarly, it is unwise (and futile) to seek congressional legislation to eliminate the harsh collateral consequences of a federal indictment in other federal agencies. Even if enacted, that legislation would not keep state regulators from pulling their licenses. The downward spiral of DPAs must be stopped at its source, by insulating corporations (but not their senior officers) from criminal prosecution. The recent McNulty memorandum doesn’t shred the Thompson memorandum. But at least it is a start.

Game, set, match — Epstein.

Tributes to a marvelous teacher

lence (1).jpgToday is the birthday of the late Ross M. Lence, one of Houston’s finest teachers of the past generation. On Dec. 1st — the final day of classes for the fall semester at the University of Houston — I was privileged to be one of the speakers at the University’s memorial service for Ross at the A.D. Bruce Religion Center on the University’s central campus.
As with most anything that involved the reasonable Dr. Lence, the service was a joyous affair, alternately hilarious and moving. Bill Monroe, one of Ross’ colleagues at The Honors College, had one of the best cracks of the day when he passed along another colleague’s observation about the notoriously difficult-to-pin-down Dr. Lence:

“A colleague and mutual friend said that, for over a decade, he thought Lence was a liberal Jew from Chicago, only to discover that he was a libertarian Catholic from White Fish, Montana.”

After a festive reception at the UH Honors College, many of those who attended the memorial service walked across campus to Robertson Stadium to attend the Conference USA Championship game between the Houston Cougars and the Southern Mississippi, which the Coogs won in stirring style. All in all, a wonderful afternoon paying tribute to a dear friend and then an enjoyable evening of college football on a beautiful fall day in Houston.
The following are pdf’s of the tributes to Ross delivered at the memorial service. Take a moment to read a bit about a great teacher and fine man who influenced the lives of thousands of Houstonians over the past 35 years:

The program for the memorial service is here;
Bill Monroe’s opening and closing remarks are here;
Susan Collins, one of Ross’ colleagues in the UH Political Science Department, gave this tribute and also passed along this tribute to Ross for PS Magazine that Susan wrote with former UH Political Science Professor Donald Lutz, who was instrumental in bringing Ross to the University of Houston;
Ed Willems, a UH Professor Emeritus of Psychology and a longtime teaching partner with Ross, gave this heartfelt tribute entitled “Ross Lence: He taught students and me.”
Andy Little, one of Ross’ longtime students and a student advisor in The Honors College, read Ross’ moving essay On Teaching;”
My tribute to Ross is here, Harris County Treasurer-elect Orlando Sanchez’s tribute is here, and the tribute of Jeff Dodd, a partner at Andrews & Kurth who specializes in corporate securities law, is here; and
Finally, Honors College Dean Ted Estess was scheduled to reprise his moving eulogy that he originally delivered in July at Ross’ funeral mass, but he chose instead to pass along extemporaneously several anecdotes and observations about Ross, a couple of which brought the house down with laughter.

Inasmuch as Ross often used to help needy and deserving students financially, The Honors College has established a scholarship fund in Ross’ name. Donations to that fund may be sent to the Ross Lence Scholarship Fund, The Honors College, University of Houston, 212 M.D. Anderson Library, Houston, TX 77204-2001.

Progressive destruction

PICT0041.JPGAs noted in this post from earlier in the fall, the University of Texas began the next stage of its master redevelopment plan for D.K. Royal Memorial Stadium immediately after the Horns’ final home game of the season against the Aggies.
This stage involves destroying the “horseshoe,” the part of the stadium that wound around the north side. The horseshoe was built in 1926 for $125,000, but it is a remnant of the days when the stadium also served as a track stadium, so the seats in the horseshoe were far from the field and not a particularly good place to watch a football game. Thus, the horseshoe will be replaced with a new end zone facility that will be much closer to the field of play and, of course, include the ubiquitous ring of club boxes. The end zone seats will be finished in time for next season and the club boxes will be completed in time for the 2008 season.
horseshoe rendition.jpgBy the way, once UT got crackin’, it didn’t take long to knock out the old horseshoe, as the time-lapse photo sequence below reflects:

An Aggie Rudy?

rudy3.jpgAs this Brent Zwerneman/San Antonio Express-News article reports,Texas Aggie non-scholarship football player Ben Bitner walks to the beat of a different drummer:

Texas A&M football player Ben Bitner’s long hair and serene manner earned him the nickname “Baby Jesus” from a teammate.
And in a tale of biblical proportions, two years ago Bitner found himself with no room at the inn.
After a dispute with a roommate over bills, Bitner, a nonscholarship junior defensive back for A&M, moved out of a house in College Station following the Aggies’ appearance in the Jan. 1, 2005 Cotton Bowl.
For a year and a half, Bitner didn’t have a place to stay. He lived under creek bridges on the A&M campus, in a fort he built in the woods near the school’s golf driving range and anywhere he could stretch his hammock or lay his sleeping bag around Aggieland.
When he wasn’t finding shadowy crannies to catch some shuteye ó “Out of sight, out of mind,” he said ó Bitner was attending classes as a history major and excelling on the Aggies’ scout team. The 5-foot-3, 160-pounder from Round Rock has played in two games this year as a member of the kickoff squad.
“I guess I’m not that smart of a guy,” said Bitner, who’s finally living in a house again. “But it was enjoyable. I slept better then than I sleep now. I didn’t have to worry about cleaning up after myself or paying bills. It suited me just fine.” [. . .]
Bitner owned a couple sets of clothes ó “I’m not one of those guys who needs 10 different shirts,” he said ó and occasionally he simply would throw his duds in his laundry bag in the team’s locker room by Kyle Field.
He would shower and clean up in the locker room or at the school’s recreation center. At night, wherever he was curled up, campus security occasionally approached him and wondered what he was doing.
“I never tried to sleep in the same place on consecutive nights,” Bitner said. “If they ran into me, they’d ask if I was student while I’d start packing my stuff. I’d tell them, ‘Yeah, sorry, I’ll get going,’ and I’d just walk off.”
Bitner said he never minded the cold days, because his parents kept their house cold when he was growing up.
“In December, January and February, that’s when it was easiest for me to sleep outside,” Bitner said. “It was hard to sleep in the summer.” [. . .]
Starter Melvin Bullitt always drilled Bitner with one question, too, during his nomadic days.
“If you take a girl out,” Bullitt would inquire, “do you ask her, ‘Hey, want to come back to my place?'”
Explained Bitner: “Hopefully, the girl would invite me back to her place. If not, I needed to get to know her a little better before I broke the news that I was homeless. . .”

Is Tony Blair’s Princess Di premonition coming true?

Tony Blair-big.jpgDuring a scene of Stephen Frears’ clever film, The Queen, British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s staff is relishing the public disdain for the Royal Family’s restrained response to Princess Diana’s death because it makes Blair — who made a passionate public response — look good in comparison. Blair — played brilliantly by Michael Sheen — grows frustrated with his staff’s gloating because he knows that the same public venom that is being directed toward the Royal Family could just as easily be directed toward him.
Based on this Daily Telegraph article, Blair may be receiving precisely what he feared:

We have become like any other nation. No more can we tell ourselves that British corruption scandals are qualitatively different from those of hot countries, or that the peccadilloes that shake our polity would barely make the newspapers in Italy. In 1994, in his first major speech as Labour leader, Tony Blair promised that, under his leadership, Britain would never again be out of step with Europe. Now, in a grisly kind of way, his ambition has been fulfilled.
With so many sleaze stories in our news pages, it is easy to become confused. A prominent Labour donor has been profiting from the recommendations of his own task-force. Gordon Brown’s supporters accuse Mr Blair of seeking to drag their man into the mire with him. Meanwhile, the Government has ordered an abrupt halt to the inquiry into allegations of hidden arms commissions, just as others begin to suspect corruption.
The sheer blizzard of allegations can leave us snow-blind. Perhaps, we tell ourselves, this is what all governments do. Perhaps Labour is no different from its predecessors. After all, wasn’t John Major brought down after a series of sexual and financial scandals?
Yes, he was. But what is happening now is of a different order. The central accusation against this ministry ñ that it has sold favours, possibly even places in the legislature, to secret donors ñ is one that has not been seriously levelled at a British government since the introduction of the universal franchise. [. . .]
Tony Blair’s belief in the superiority of his motives leads him to reason that, when the New Labour project is at stake, the ends justify the means.
We saw this within weeks of his accession when he sought to explain the Ecclestone affair ñ the first of many cash-for-favours scandals ñ on the basis that he was a pretty straight kinda guy. That, essentially, remains his attitude: he regards complaints about probity as petty next to what he is doing for Britain.
A decade later, parliament is cheapened, and the police have been called into Downing Street. That, more than the transformation of his party, more than Scottish devolution, more even than Iraq, will be his legacy.

The Smart Money

betting-069-06.gifAs Captain Renault — Claude Rains’ character in Casablanca — might say, “I’m shocked, shocked that there is betting on sporting events!:”

The Brain Trust [is] a shadowy cabal of gamblers who wager enormous amounts of money on sports events, using a supercomputer and a SWAT team of injury and weather experts to take advantage of minor discrepancies in the point spreads set up by the Vegas linemakers. Itís a multimillion-dollar business ó and legal ó but thereís a wrinkle: they like to bet hundreds of thousands of dollars per game, and whenever the casinos sniff out betting syndicates like the Brain Trust, they show them the door in a heartbeat. Thatís because in addition to risking huge losses each week, the bookmakers are forced to adjust their betting lines ó sometimes by two or three points for a football game ó whenever the ìsmart moneyî wades in, since they desperately need other customers to bet the other side to balance their action and stand a chance of making money.

The foregoing excerpt is from this NY Times book review of Michael Konik’s new book, The Smart Money (Simon & Schuster 2006). As Konik notes, the Brain Trust attempts to manipulate the point spread on sporting events in the same way that hedge funds and currency speculators attempt to move the stock market on certain stocks and currencies. Capt. Renault would almost certainly be playing.

2006 Weekly local football review

Carr getting sacked again.jpgPatriots 40 Texans 7
Just when you thought it was impossible for the Texans (4-10) to stoop any lower, the Texans’ offense rolled over and played dead against the Patriots.
This one was over by Sunday morning brunch as the Texans were down 17-zip after the first quarter and 27-zip at half. Actually, the Texans’ defense did not play badly, but the Texans offense continually placed the defense in untenable positions. QB David Carr continues to look like a basket case, going 16-28 for a net 93 yards with 4 interceptions, 4 sacks and, as usual, no TD passes. I have long had doubts about Carr, but it’s becoming more certain with each passing game that Carr will not be an effective QB for the Texans. Whether it’s the constant pounding that he has taken as a result of the lack of protection from the Texans’ deficient offensive line, his poor recognition skills or his dubious leadership qualities, Carr has regressed to a point in Houston that Coach Gary Kubiak’s sideline vibes decisively indicate that he has given up on Carr.
However, as bad as Carr has been, certainly Kubiak and Texans’ owner Bob McNair have to share in the blame for the woeful state of this team. As noted earlier here, after giving up on the Casserly-Capers regime, McNair changed the management model of the Texans football operation from a strong GM model to a strong head coach model. There is nothing wrong with that, but rather than hiring an experienced head coach, McNair opted for local boy-made-good Kubiak, who had never been more than a top offensive assistant in a strong head coach model that was run by an offensive coach (Denver’s Mike Shanahan). The transition from assistant to head coach has been anything but smooth for Kubiak — the Texans’ defense has improved somewhat from last season’s disastrous unit, but the Texans’ offense is actually worse than last season’s, which was almost unimaginable before this season began. Add in the fact that Carr and the Texans’ offense have actually regressed in development under Kubiak’s tutelage, the luster of Kubiak’s reputation as an up-and-coming offensive coach has certainly been dulled.
At any rate, the Texans have two home games left to end the season, against the Colts (10-3, playing tonight) and the Browns (4-10). It looks as if the Texans’ offense has packed it in, so it’s hard to imagine that the team could beat anyone these days. But stranger things have happened. Let’s just hope that another win or two doesn’t result in a dramatic downward change in the Texans’ draft position for the 2007 NFL Draft. The Texans need all the help they can get.

The University of Houston Master Plan

The University of Houston has been making some big plans recently, and this Matt Tresaugue/Chronicle article reviews them:

UH leaders intend to transform the campus with more housing, more restaurants, more shops and other places to be outside the classroom.

The goal, campus leaders said, is to create an environment that attracts the best scholars and encourages them to stick around. [. . .]

The plan also calls for doubling the usable square footage of classroom and office space, replacing parking lots with garages and closing part of Cullen to create a tree-lined pedestrian walkway by 2020.

What’s more, the campus would meld with the surrounding Third Ward while reducing blight and encouraging more retailers to move in. University officials already are talking with private developers about a “town center” with shops and restaurants on both sides of Scott between Holman and Alabama.

Campus leaders do not know how much everything would cost but estimate the first five-year phase at $300 million, and largely at the university’s expense. The redevelopment plan will be a key piece of an upcoming fundraising campaign, officials said.[ . . .]

The new plan would establish five themed precincts on campus, reflecting the “smart growth” trend elsewhere, with dense housing, retail and office space in village configurations.

The interior of the campus would be almost untouched.

To the north, campus leaders envision an arts village with a sculpture garden, outdoor amphitheater, cafes, galleries and housing, including loft apartments, on what are now parking lots.

About 1.6 million square feet of academic buildings and housing for graduate students would be added to the so-called professional precinct, to the east of the campus core.

Another area, the Wheeler precinct, would be devoted to undergraduates, with plans calling for low-rise residence halls to blend with the nearby University Oaks neighborhood.

To the west would be a Robertson Stadium precinct with 1.9 million square feet in new academic buildings, housing and retail near two proposed Metro light rail lines.

The University’s summary of its master plan — with renditions and video — is here.

Despite the story on the ambitious UH master plan, the Chronicle still ignores the more important story about UH.

The University of Houston in many ways is the most remarkable major public university in Texas. Started in 1927 as a junior college, UH grew quickly during its infancy while being endowed entirely with philanthropic contributions from generous Houstonians, which was made all the more remarkable by the fact that, at the same time, Houstonians were also contributing substantial amounts to the Rice University endowment.

Inasmuch as bustling UH did not even become a state university until 1963, UH has received only a fraction of the endowed capital that the state has provided to its two older public university systems, the University of Texas and Texas A&M University.

As a result, UH routinely provides a comparable contribution to Houston and the state as UT and A&M while operating with far less capital than those two institutions, which means that UH provides “more bang for the educational buck” than either UT or A&M.

With the recent expansion of the MD Anderson Library into the centerpiece of the central campus, along with the development of innovative programs such as the Honors College, UH has already become an increasingly attractive choice for Texas students.

Implementation of the master plan is the next logical step in that evolution.

It’s good that the local newspaper is noticing that, but it makes one wonder how much more benefit UH could contribute to Houston and the state if its endowed capital were on par with that of UT or A&M?

That’s a story that needs to be examined, and here’s hoping that the Chronicle eventually tackles it.