Adam Everett’s flyswatting

adam%20Everett%20at%20st%205_0.jpgShortstop Adam Everett is the Stros’ best defensive player and a truly elegant fielder. As a result, Chronicle Stros beat writer Brian McTaggert attempts to rationalize Everett’s horrible hitting:

Set to make his fourth consecutive opening-day start and fifth overall at shortstop, Everett hit .239 last year but posted career highs in RBIs (59), doubles (28), triples (six) and walks (34). [. . .]
Twenty points higher for Everett last year would simply have meant 10 additional hits sprinkled over six months. The thin line between perceived success and failure is why it hasn’t been uncommon to see Everett spend a few additional minutes in the batting cages this spring.

Talk about rose-colored glasses. Everett is one of the worst hitting regular players in Stros history, just behind the worst hitter, teammate Brad Ausmus. To give you an idea of how bad a hitter Everett is, he set the Stros single season record for worst on base average versus the league average in 2006, the 2nd consecutive year he’s done that:
Adam%20Everett%20OBA.gif
Baseball Prospectus estimates that Everett saved the Stros 20 more runs last season with his defensive prowess than an average National League fielder would have saved for his team. Given that Everett’s runs created against average was a -31, that means that Everett cost the Stros at least 11 runs from what an average National League hitter at his position would have generated for the Stros.
With an immobile Biggio at second and an iffy outfield defense, the Stros can ill-afford give up Everett’s glove in the everyday lineup. But make no mistake about it, his hitting is very bad and remains one of the big problems for the ballclub.

Old-timey photographs

shorpy.com%20thumbnail.jpgShorpy.com is an innovative new blog that presents old photographs from around the United States over the past century. As the blog’s authors describe it, “Shorpy is a photo blog about what life a hundred years ago was like: How people looked and what they did for a living, back when not having a job usually meant not eating.”
The photo on the left is from Houston. Called “The Banana Wagon: 1943,” the May, 1943 photo shows a house with a fruit stand in Houston on Franklin Street. Note the laundry hanging around the second floor porch. Check out this interesting new blog.

That’s one heckuva garage

200%20Eleventh%20Avenue.gifThis post from awhile back noted that what it costs to rent a parking space in New York City could rent a nice apartment in Houston. But if you think that’s pricey for a parking space, you haven’t seen anything, yet.
At 200 Eleventh Avenue — a new 16 unit condo project in Manhattan (HT Felix Salmon) — the developers are offering an “en-suite garage” for a prospective owner’s automobile in 14 of the units. The website has a simulation that shows how the owner would drive his or her car into the building and into an elevator, which then takes the car to the owner’s unit, where they then drive into their 300 square foot “en-suite garage.” The cheapest unit in the development costs $4.7 million for 2,353 square feet, so that en-suite garage costs a cool $600,000, which would buy one very nice entire condo in downtown Houston.
I wonder if the developers throw in a workbench with that garage? ;^)

The folly of the “resemble Augusta” approach

sho_logo032607.jpgIn the Chronicle’s seemingly never-ending campaign to give the Shell Houston Open relevance, this Steve Campbell/Sunday Chronicle article reports that SHO officials are planning on setting up the Tournament Course at Redstone in a manner similar to the way that Augusta National will be set up for next week’s Master’s Tournament.
Except that Redstone is a flat-land course with none of Augusta National’s dramatic elevation changes. And Redstone has relatively slow bermuda grass greens that contain little of the severe undulation found in many of Augusta National’s lightning-fast bentgrass greens. And despite the fact that only 23 of the players playing in the SHO have qualified for and will be playing in The Master’s.
Coincidentally, during Sunday afternoon’s telecast of the final round of the CA Championship at Doral and just hours after the foregoing Chronicle story ran, NBC interviewer Jimmy Roberts asked Phil Mickelson why he is departing this week from his usual policy of playing in the tournament that immediately precedes a major tournament. Mickelson — who has not played in the SHO in years — replied that he is not playing this week because the Tournament Course at Redstone is nothing like Augusta National and Redstone’s bermuda greens will do nothing to prepare him for Augusta’s bentgrass greens. Mickelson’s comments were a clear shot at the SHO and the PGA Tour’s decision to move the tournament to a date the week before The Masters.
So much for that “resemble Augusta” approach to reinventing the SHO. Ironically, if only the Houston Golf Association and The Woodlands Corporation could have overcome their clash of egos several years ago for the good of the tournament, the SHO could be playing on a course that actually does have some of the elevation changes of Augusta National.
As with last year’s tournament, only two of the top 10 players in the World Golf Ranking are playing in the SHO (Adam Scott and Padraig Harrington). Also, the highest-rated Texan — Chad Campbell — is again not playing in the SHO. Although only eight of the top 30 players in the world and 20 of the top 60 will be playing in the SHO, that’s an improvement over last year when only four players in the top 30 and 12 of the top 60 played. In the difficult world of tournaments that have fallen into the Tiger Chasm, that passes as improvement for the SHO, which continues to suffer from the consequences of some dubious decisions.

The Gonzales affair

alberto-gonzales.jpgI leave to the political blogs the current spat over former Houstonian and current Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ handling of the firing of eight U.S. Attorneys from various parts of the country, but I did chuckle over Jay Leno’s comment from one of his monolouge’s from late last week:

President Bush held a news conference where he accused the Democrats of playing politics with the firing of the U.S. attorneys. You know, the attorneys he fired for not playing politics.

I don’t know enough about the facts of this affair to make an informed judgment on what ought to be done. However, it does occur to me that the President should be a bit troubled that his Attorney General does not know how to fire some subordinates properly. The database of emails relating to the firings is here.

Lopez on McNair’s Carr miscalculation

bob%20mcnair.jpgFollowing on this weekend post on the end of the David Carr era for the Houston Texans, John Lopez — who for my money is the Chronicle’s best sportswriter — provides this column that provides the type of insight (i.e., how the relationship between Texans owner Bob McNair and Carr protracted the Texans’ mistake in relying on Carr) that was utterly missing from fellow Chronicle sports columnist Richard Justice’s commentary on Carr’s exit:

McNair loved David Carr until it hurt. That was the biggest problem of all.
For all the other things that hurt this club, all the people and decisions involved, all the bad luck and bad contracts, it was the relationship between owner and quarterback that set so many things spiraling downward.
McNair loved all the things Carr stood for as a man, a husband and father. He loved the way Carr handled himself as the face of the franchise.
Love was blind.
The Texans, specifically coach Gary Kubiak and general manager Rick Smith, are in one fine mess now, their careers clinging to a life preserver named Matt Schaub, for a number of reasons. Many of the problems, they inherited. But it started with McNair investing too much emotionally.

Read the entire column. Lopez is on the money that there are operational problems in the Texans front office in the area of player evaluation and contract negotiation. It’s not clear to me by any stretch that the Kubiak coaching regime has corrected those problems.
By the way, the current thinking around the NFL is that Carr will be reunited with former Texans coach Dom Capers (now the defensive coordinator) in Miami.

Extraordinary performances

kobe%20bryant.jpgAlthough most folks who enjoy basketball are currently preoccupied with the ongoing NCAA Basketball Tournament at the moment, Kobe Bryant’s extraordinary effort over the past week should be noted as the Lakers star scored 65, 50, 60 and 50 in consecutive games. Only Wilt Chamberlain has scored at least 50 points in more consecutive NBA games, having reeled off a streak of seven games during the 1961-62 season. To appreciate just how zoned in Bryant is right now, check out this turnaround three-pointer he nailed the other night against Portland.
And while on the subject of spectacular NBA performances, don’t miss this five minute video of former Celtic great Larry Bird’s seemingly endless array of buzzerbeater baskets with some pretty funny commentary from his teammates and opponents.
Finally, this short video includes the best piece of sportscasting commentary that I’ve heard in a long time.

The end of the Carr era

David_Carr%20032307.jpgThe David Carr era of the Houston Texans came to a merciful end yesterday as the Texans released Carr, the team’s first NFL draft pick in its five year history.
I didn’t agree with the Texans decision to take Carr as the first overall pick in the 2002 NFL draft and I expressed skepticism about him in each of my three pre-season previews of the Texans since starting this blog back in early 2004 (see here, here and here). Carr’s performance really deteriorated over this past season, (here, here and here), so he became essentially untradeable. It’s true that the Texans’ porous offensive line subjected Carr to an inhumane amount of physical abuse over the years, but effectiveness in football is much more interdependent on one’s teammates than, say, baseball, and Carr’s lack of development over his five seasons certainly didn’t help the OLine, either.
The Texans decision to release Carr and trade for Falcons backup QB Matt Schaub has been the talk of the town the past couple of days, and the reactions have been all over the map. One of the more curious ones has been that of Chronicle sports columnist Richard Justice, who is self-righteously indignant that Carr didn’t work out in Houston:

What we’ll never know is what would have happened if Carr had gotten with an organization that knew what it was doing. The Texans never protected him or coached him, never put enough talent around him. Shame on you, Charley Casserly. Shame on you, too, Bob McNair. Maybe you guys were wrong about what David Carr could have been, but you never gave him a chance to find out.

Of course, this is the same Richard Justice who, as recently as a year and a half ago, was effusive in his praise of both Carr and Texans management during the middle of the team’s free-fall from a promising expansion team to a laughingstock of the NFL:

The Texans are respectable. They’re coming close. They’ve got four 2-7 teams left on their schedule. They almost won in Jacksonville, and they made a run at the Indianapolis Colts before losing 31-17 Sunday. [. . .]
The Texans are a better offensive team since [since-fired offensive coordinator Joe] Pendry took over [for the fired Chris Palmer]. David Carr looks like he’s on his way to becoming a first-rate quarterback. He’s quicker and more accurate in his throws, less likely to take a sack.

In reality, Casserly and McNair were constantly attempting to upgrade the talent around Carr, they simply weren’t able to pull it off. Tony Boselli and Orlando Pace are just two of several top-level offensive linemen who the Texans unsuccessfully attempted to hire as an anchor for the OLine over the past five years. Granted, Casserly and McNair didn’t get it done, but it sure wasn’t for lack of trying. Justice is being petty in not pointing that out.
Meanwhile, Justice gushes over the progress of the Texans under the Gary Kubiak regime:

If you care about the Texans, you should be happy this morning. A page has been turned. Moving on, moving up. In two off-seasons under Gary Kubiak and Rick Smith, the Texans have undergone a significant facelift. By the beginning of next season, there’ll be few reminders of the [former coach] Dom [Capers] and [former GM] Charley [Casserly] era.
You should be happy about your new quarterback. Matt Schaub has a chance to be really good. He’s no sure thing, but Jake Plummer, Jeff Garcia and Brady Quinn aren’t sure things, either.
The Texans paid a high price for Schaub and they’re taking a chance. No franchise gets better without taking some chances. Let’s be optimistic for a second. Let’s pretend the glass is half-full.
They’ve got a Pro Bowl wide receiver on one side of the field in Andre Johnson. They’ve got a very good tight end in Owen Daniels. They’ve got a productive runnning back in Ahman Green. Hopefully, they’ll match the offer to FB Vonta Leach. They’ve got more depth and talent in the O-line than ever before. If they can find another receiver in the draft, they’ll have the makings of a very good offense. [. . .]
The bottom line is they’re making progress. They’ve added a running back and a quarterback and a bunch of experienced, professional guys. If they have a good draft, they’ll be positioned for their first .500 season.

Maybe so, but in addition to coughing up $48 million over six years for a guy who has never been a starting NFL quarterback, the Texans dealt some serious draft-day compensation to land new QB Schaub. Was it too much? Probably not, particularly given that a quarterback taken in the first round of the draft is not an even money bet of developing into an above-average NFL QB. For every John Elway, Peyton, Troy Aikman or Carson Palmer, there are far more David Carr’s, Tim Couch’s, Akili Smith’s and Ryan Leaf’s.
But while continuing to bash McNair and the previous Casserly-Capers regime, why is Justice giving Kubiak a pass on the first key decision that he made in his tenure as the Texans coach — that is, Kubiak’s initial blunder in agreeing to retain Carr in the first place? That decision was as bad as any of the dubious decisions of the Casserly era. The Texans paid an $8 million option bonus after the 2005 season ended and before Kubiak was hired to secure the rights to Carr for three more seasons, so maybe Kubiak took the Texans head coaching job without really having any choice but to keep Carr. But by not pressing the issue that Carr was an inadequate QB last year, Kubiak blew an opportunity to dangle the No. overall 1 pick during the 2006 NFL draft in a trade. A trade of that spot could have easily allowed the Texans to receive some much-needed value plus move back a few spots in the draft and still draft either Matt Leinart, Jay Cutler or Vince Young, the Houston and UT icon who went on to win the NFL offensive Rookie of the Year Award and become the first rookie quarterback to play in the NFL Pro Bowl.
Justice may not care about any of that, but my sense is that most Texans fans won’t forget about it until Kubiak and Schaub are leading the team into the playoffs. From my vantage point, that still appears to be a long way’s off.

Credit snobs

sub-prime-mortgages-newtxt1932306.gifThese earlier posts touched on what is often ignored among the handwringers in regard to the current downturn in the subprime mortgage market — that is, the beneficial risk-taking that resulted from innovation in the securitization of subprime mortgages. That risk-taking helped fuel the robust mortgage market over the past several years for folks who otherwise would not have had an opportunity to choose whether to take the risk of home ownership. Following along those lines, MR’s Alex Tabarrok makes a good point about the bias of many of the handwringers:

Yeah, we get it. Credit is ok for us, the “sober” borrowers but poor people can’t handle credit. Too much credit among the poor generates decay and social pathology. Credit must be regulated. We can’t, for example, have credit stores in poor neighborhoods. Don’t you know that credit is bad for people without self-discipline? Let the poor buy on installment credit? That’s unconscionable. Today’s furor over sub-prime mortgages is the same old story. [. . .]
The fact that there are defaults is partly a learning process in response to financial innovation, and thus evolution, but also partly a simple matter of risk. Defaults are to be expected. I see no reason to expect contagion. All lending statistics must now be marked to the global financial market which means that diversification is now more extensive than ever before and thus net risk is lower. Moreover, the whole point of recent financial innovation (and reformed bankruptcy law) has been to reallocate risk away from borrowers and towards those lenders in the world wide market for capital who are in the best position to handle the risk.
The democratization of credit worries the credit snobs. The credit snobs fear that capitalism isn’t just for the rich.

Touche’!

Steyn on the Black trial

mark_steyn.jpgThis earlier post on the Conrad Black trial noted that syndicated writer Mark Steyn is blogging the trial and, if you haven’t been checking in on Steyn’s blog, you’re missing some rollicking good fun. Check out this post from Wednesday’s festivites in which he notes:

The government called its first witness this afternoon: Gordon Paris, Conrad Blackís successor as chairman of Hollinger International. In Homeric terms, heís the first Paris to turn out a Trojan horse. I sat behind Mr. Paris as he waited to take the stand and, to judge from the back of his neck, heís been working on his tan; his jet black hair was so luxuriously gelled I could see my face in it. For a man whoís taken his companyís share price from $21 to $4, he was looking good. If he felt sheepish about the most recent quarterly loss and the suspension of the dividend, his coiffure certainly betrayed no signs of it. The healthy glow led me to expect a performance as slick as his hair, but, in fact, he answered in a kind of semi-tranquillized drone, vaguely reminiscent of Eugene Levyís spaced out has-been folkie in A Mighty Wind. [. . .]
But the government attempted to introduce in evidence a chart showing Conrad Blackís share of ownership escalating up the chain from Hollinger International through Hollinger Inc to Ravelston Corporation and asked Mr Paris to testify that these figures were accurate.
Mr Paris did so, and the defence pounced. How did he know these figures were accurate? When did he see the chart?
Well, heíd been shown it a few days ago.
So had he verified the numbers from public records?
ìI certainly knew from my experience,î said Mr Paris, ìthat those numbers were reasonableÖî
ìReasonable or accurate?î asked the lead Black attorney, Edward Genson.
ìI was toldÖî
ìWho told you?î
Mr Parisí gelled hair strands seemed to wilt visibly. ìThe government,î he conceded.
Gotcha. Chicago Legal had suddenly morphed into just about every other Perry Mason episode between 1957 and 1972 where Perry gets the star witness to admit that heís testifying to the truth of something he only knows the truth of because the district attorney told him it was true.

Steyn’s summary post on the first week of the trial is here.