The Rumsfeld Reorganization

rumsfeld3.jpgDon’t miss this important David Von Drehle/Washington Post article that provides a decent overview of the reorganization of the Defense Department under Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld during preparations for the Iraq War. This is an important issue that has been festering since the Reagan Administration and has major domestic and foreign policy implications (previous posts on the issue are here). However, the issue tends to fly somewhat beneath the radar screen for various reasons, not the least of which is the depth of the issue and the overshadowing effect of related issues, such as detainee policy.
Into this mini-vacuum of analysis, Mr. Von Drehle does a good job of framing the issue:

Diving in, he found his marching orders in a speech given by candidate Bush at the Citadel in 1999, calling for a “transformation” of the great but lumbering U.S. military. The Cold War force was built around big foreign bases and heavy weapons “platforms,” such as tank columns and aircraft carriers. With the Cold War over, Bush said, America should use the chance to “skip a generation” of weaponry and tactics to seize the future of warfare ahead of everyone else. A transformed military would be lightly armored, rapidly deployable, invisible to radar, guided by satellites. It would fight with Special Operations troops and futuristic “systems” of weaponry, robots alongside soldiers, all linked by computers. This force would be unmatchable in combat, Bush predicted, but it should not be used for the sort of “nation-building” that characterized Pentagon deployments to Haiti and the Balkans under Clinton.

Continue reading

Richard Justice said what?

justice6.gifChronicle sportswriter Richard Justice says some of the darndest things. Take the following quotes from today’s column on the current state of the hapless Houston Texans:

“The Texans are respectable. They’re coming close. They’ve got four 2-7 teams left on their schedule. They almost won in Jacksonville, and they made a run at the Indianapolis Colts before losing 31-17 Sunday.”

The Texans are respectable? In nine games this season, the Texans have been in only three games that they had a reasonable chance to win, albeit two of those have been in the last three games. As for making “a run” against the Colts, when the Texans closed to 21-14 in the third quarter, Peyton Manning and the Colts offense reeled off a five play, 75 yard march for a touchdown that made the Texans defense look as if it would have a difficult time stopping a hard-chargin’ marching band. If that’s respectable, then I would hate to see what Justice considers just plain bad.

Continue reading

Rationalizing a bad system

Scales_of_justice.jpgBeing independent politically, I tend to look for political issues where the right position is so clear that advocacy of the opposing view is an indication of a politician who is interested in something other than improving government. This Chronicle article addresses one such issue — Texas’ utterly unsupportable system of electing judges. This earlier Daily Texan article does the same.
Texas’ system of judicial elections is, at best, not a good way to choose judges and, at its worst, a corrupt one. Along with former Texas Attorney General and state Supreme Court Justice John Hill, former state Supreme Court Justice Tom Phillips and many others, I have been supporting for over 20 years a new system for appointing judges in the Texas state courts similar to the appointment process that is used in the federal judicial system. This is not to say that the system in which federal judges is selected is perfect and does not generate a bad judge from time to time. But the risk of a bad judge reaching the bench in the federal system is far less than it currently is under the Texas system of judicial selection.

Continue reading