A frequent topic on this blog has been the government’s questionable tactic of bludgeoning business executives into plea bargains by playing on the executive’s fear of a draconian prison sentence (often an effective life sentence) if the executive has the temerity to assert his or her Constitutional right to a fair trial by jury. Although prosecutors justify such tactics as a reasonable tool in seeking the truth about criminal acts of others, plea bargainers often undermine that goal by testifying falsely in order to obtain the favorable terms of the deal.
In this post, Ellen Podgor — who blogs with Peter Henning over at the smart White Collar Crime Prof blog — compares the sentences to date arising out of the prosecutions of former WorldCom executives, notes the wide disparity between those who cooperated with the government and those who did not, and then asks the right questions:
Monthly Archives: August 2005
KPMG strikes deal in tax shelter probe
You know that the criminalization of business in the post-Enron era has become routine when it’s newsworthy that the government has decided not to use its prosecutorial power to prompt another Arthur Andersen-type meltdown of a major accounting firm.
This NY Times article reports that KPMG and federal prosecutors have agreed in principle to a deferred prosecution deal under which the accounting firm would avoid a devastating criminal indictment for its involvement in the creation and promotion of questionable tax shelters in return for KPMG paying a hefty fine, which the Times article reports could be as much as half a billion dollars. Here are the earlier posts on the KPMG tax shelter probe and related problems.
A special talent
I have no idea where my nephew Richard comes up with such things, but the two minute video that he links to in this blog post is pretty darn clever.
By the way, Rich, I highly recommend that you do not attempt to perfect the skill evidenced in the video while juggling your distractions this fall at Northwestern University Law School. Not that it would interfere with your studies that much. Rather, too many professors would be pestering you to teach them how to do it! ;^)
The PGA at Baltusrol is this week
The PGA Golf Championship begins tomorrow at Baltusrol Golf Club in Springfield, N.J. Golf Digest has its usual excellent coverage here, including this nifty interactive map.
By the way, this interesting Golf Digest article on the 1965 PGA Tournament — which was won by the late Houstonian Dave Marr — includes a funny anecdote about Ben Hogan that Dave passed along to me years ago over lunch at Houston’s Lochinvar Golf Club. Dave loved telling this story and did so humorously, so my written rendition of it cannot do Dave’s oral version justice. But the story went something like this:
The SOX drain
The Sarbanes-Oxley legislation (pdf) is an example of government at its worst — a knee-jerk reaction that addressed a relatively small problem (i.e., crooked businesspeople) that had little to do with the circumstances (i.e., the bursting of a stock market bubble) that prompted legislators to think that they needed to do something in the first place. Inasmuch as the SOX legislation coincided with the beginning of this blog, the counterproductive nature of the legislation has been a regular subject here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
In this timely article, financial columnist Bruce Bartlett (his blog is here) notes that the SOX effect on the economy is only getting worse, and reviews the growing body of research on the negative economic impact of SOX:
Disney Board wins the corporate case of the decade
The Delaware Chancellory Court issued its ruling yesterday in favor of the Walt Disney Company Board of Directors in the corporate case of the decade — i.e., the civil lawsuit over The Walt Disney Co. board’s decision to pay Michael Ovitz a rather generous severance package for essentially doing nothing during his short stay at Disney (earlier posts on the case are here, here and here). You can download a copy of the 175 page decision here and, based on a preliminary review, it appears that Larry Ribstein nailed it with his earlier prediction, which also provides excellent background on the fact and legal issues involved in the case. H’mm, I wonder if Professor Ribstein got any odds on his bet on the outcome of the decision?
As noted in this earlier post, check in at the Conglomerate blog for a discussion of the Disney decision by an outstanding group of corporate law scholars. Should be highly entertaining.
The politics of charity in the world of health care
Wealthy Houston plaintiff’s lawyer John O’Quinn (earlier posts here and here) recently proposed to donate $25 million to St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital — the largest gift in the hospital’s 50 year history — in return for renaming the hospital’s highly-recognizable medical tower the “O’Quinn Medical Tower at St. Luke’s.”
Well, the Chronicle’s Todd Ackerman, who does a fine job of staying on top of Medical Center stories, reports in this article that the St. Luke’s board’s decision to accept the donation from Mr. O’Quinn is not going over well with a number of St. Luke’s doctors:

The plan to rename the edifice after John O’Quinn in recognition of a $25 million donation by his foundation has infuriated many St. Luke’s doctors, who last week began circulating a petition against it and Monday night convened an emergency meeting of the medical executive committee.
George Melloan gets it
A couple of months ago, this post noted Wall Street Journal columnist George Melloan‘s op-ed on the Supreme Court’s Andersen decision in which he harshly criticized the government’s abuse of the rule of law to pursue currently unpopular businesspeople. Today, in this WSJ ($) Global View column, Mr. Melloan focuses on a common subject of this blog — the unjust nature of criminalizing corporate agency costs.
Mr. Melloan’s column focuses on the agency cost of corporate accounting:
Corporate accounting, contrary to popular belief, is chock-full of judgment calls. It’s a happy hunting ground for a prosecutor looking for decisions he can say were intended to mislead investors and might thus constitute criminal fraud. If an admiring press rewards him with a big headline, who’s to know, . . ?
On the Internet’s booms and busts
Rich Karlgaard is publisher of Forbes magazine and author of Life 2.0 (Crown Business, 2004). In this wonderful Wall Street Journal ($) op-ed, Mr. Kaalgaard examines the tremendous progress of the Internet over the past 20 years by pointing out that the risks taken in the booms and busts during the period are the engine of that progress. He uses the wildly over-priced Netscape IPO of 10 years ago (has it really been that long?) as one of his examples of the risk-taking that did not work out, and wryly passes along the following anecdote about one analyst’s attempt at a joke about pricing Internet companies during those exuberant times:
Analyst Bill Gurley sends out a spoof email. After noting the history of deteriorating valuation benchmarks, from cash flow, to EBIT, to EBITDA, to “price-per-click,” announces the ultimate Internet valuation benchmark: EBE, or “earnings before expenses.” Most readers don’t realize Mr. Gurley is joking.
This is a bit out of my league
This NY Times article reports on the progress of the new Liberty National Golf Club, which is located just across the Hudson River from Manhattan. With its breathtaking views of the Manhattan skyline and the Statute of Liberty, the golf course is generating quite a buzz in golfing circles, although not among the crowd that I normally play with:
[T]he lush and very private Liberty National Golf Club has sprouted across from the Manhattan skyline. This $150 million project by Paul B. Fireman, the property’s owner and the chief executive of Reebok; his son Dan; and the golf-design tandem of Kite and Bob Cupp is creating a buzz less than a year before the first players tee off.
Built on 160 acres and covering 4,000 feet of waterfront, the course stretches 7,400 yards from the back tees, with small rivers running through it and a $1 million cart path built with Belgian stones. . . The course will offer a 15-minute luxury yacht service from Manhattan and, for those with quicker needs, a helipad.
Each member will have a custom-made set of clubs that will always be available at the course, a kind of thank-you gift for joining a club with an initiation fee of around $500,000.
Sure am glad they put in that helipad. ;^)