More on Perverted Justice

perverted%20justice.gifAwhile back, this post noted the sad case of Louis Conradt, Jr, the Terrell, Texas prosecutor who killed himself late last year as the police were knocking on his door to arrest him. Conradt’s arrest was a part of a sting operation set up by Perverted Justice, the group that NBC Dateline has adopted as a highly profitable vehicle for generating mass anxiety about child sexual offenders. A Dateline NBC camera crew was outside Conradt’s house when he killed himself.
As this recent Allen Salkin/NY Times article notes, this arrangement has been mutually profitable for Perverted Justice and NBC. Perverted Justice receives $70,000 for every hour of Dateline content, while Dateline uses the 9 million or so viewers per pedophile episode to generate more ad revenue (Dateline nets only 7 million viewers for non-Pedo Dateline episodes). Inasmuch as business is good, Dateline already has six more Pedo-Dateline episodes in the pipeline for 2007.
In this insightful post, Dan Filler over at Concurring Opinions wonders about the efficacy of the Dateline-Perverted Justice venture and where it is leading us:

I leave to the Times article, and the various policy advocates, a discussion of the utility of this joint project. Will it reduce internet child abuse? Hard to know. Will it cause innocent people to suffer? Unclear. But it is time that we come to understand that the trade in fetishized fetishes is if nothing else weird and discomforting. And perhaps – just perhaps – it twists our own culture in exactly the direction we most abhor.

Reviewing the best Web technology of 2006

first-technology-pxa3.jpgDallas lawyer Tom Mighell is the dean of Texas law bloggers and is a widely-respected expert on application of technology to the practice of law. Along with fellow legal technology expert Dennis Kennedy, Tom writes a monthly column entitled “Strongest Links” for the ABA Law Practice Management magazine that highlights helpful technologies.
In this column, Tom and Dennis provide their “Strongest of the Strongest Links” that they wrote about during 2006. Although written primarily for folks interested in application of the technologies in the practice of law, most of the technologies are helpful for anyone interested in using their time more efficiently. Check it out.

The final verdict on David Carr

David_Carr1.jpgDave Berri over at the Wages of Wins blog has posted his final ratings for NFL quarterbacks for the 2006 season (related blog post here). The final rating is further confirmation that the David Carr saga is over in Houston.
As noted earlier here, here and here, Berri’s QB rating is a much more accurate measure of a QB’s true value than the misleading QB rating that the NFL uses (incredibly, the formula for the NFL rating system not only is complicated and unclear, it also ignores sacks, yards lost from sacks, rushing yards, rushing attempts, and fumbles!). Carr finished the season ranked 28th among the 32 starting NFL QB’s (he ranked 15th in the NFL’s official rating), higher only than such luminaries as Joey Harrington, Charlie Frye, Bruce Gradkowski and Andrew Walter. Suffice it to say that Texans coach Gary Kubiak — who had nothing to do with the decision to use the Texans’ first draft choice in history to acquire Carr — will not likely elect to continue hitching his coaching legacy to the wagon of such high-priced mediocrity at the QB position.
Carr is a nice fellow, so it’s too bad that it didn’t work out for him in Houston. The team certainly didn’t do him any favors, what with a chronically make-shift offensive line and several failed forays at acquiring a true left tackle to protect Carr’s backside. And it’s important to remember that player statistics tracked in football are not the same as statistics tracked in baseball. In baseball, many of the hitting statistics that are tracked reflect the ability of the individual. In football, however, this is not precisely the case. The stats that a quarterback accumulates are a reflection of not only his ability, but also the ability of his teammates, his coaches and the defensive players that the quarterback faces. Consequently, it’s not always the case that even Berri’s QB rating shows that one player is “better” than another player.
But after five seasons, Carr’s numerous technical deficiencies — poor reading skills, a low release point that causes many tipped balls at the line of scrimmage, poor pocket presence, mediocre leadership skills, inability to handle the shotgun formation, etc. — are simply too numerous to overlook. His abysmal QB rating simply confirms that he is unlikely to improve to even an average level of NFL quarterback. At this point, backup Sage Rosenfels is a far better bet than Carr to achieve a better-than-average QB rating in the 2007 season.
By the way, for the fourth consecutive year the top quarterback in the NFL is Peyton Manning, who achieved a QB score over 2,000 under Berri’s rating system, only the fourth time that a QB has attained that level since 1995. In watching Manning in his prime, we are witnessing one of the truly great NFL QB’s in history.