The V.A. as a reform model for the health care finance system?

VA_Pho59.jpgMy late father had extensive experience in providing and administering medical care in the Veterans Administration system, which he used to characterize as a good example of an unnecessary governmental program that perpetuated itself because of the vested interests of those who administer and profit from the system. “It’s a reasonably competent system for dispensing penicillen,” he once observed to me. “But you wouldn’t want to have gall bladder surgery over there.”
Thus, imagine my surprise a few weeks ago when NY Times columnist Paul Krugman, in his generally informative series on America’s broken health care finance system, authored this Times Select ($) column in which he touts the VA system as a model for a single-payor, government-administered health care finance system in the US:

American health care is desperately in need of reform. But what form should change take? Are there any useful examples we can turn to for guidance?
Well, I know about a health care system that has been highly successful in containing costs, yet provides excellent care. And the story of this system’s success provides a helpful corrective to anti-government ideology. For the government doesn’t just pay the bills in this system — it runs the hospitals and clinics.
No, I’m not talking about some faraway country. The system in question is our very own Veterans Health Administration, whose success story is one of the best-kept secrets in the American policy debate.

Krugman goes on to extol the virtues of the VA’s integrated system, which includes the government’s superior ability to “bargain hard with medical suppliers, and pay far less for drugs than most private insurers.”
Clear Thinkers favorite Peter Gordon sums up what my father’s opinion of Krugman’s analysis almost certainly would be:

This is very cool. I imagine that nearly everything could be obtained cheaply if only the federal government were put in charge to “bargain hard.”
Silly me. I fear that the government is an expensive middleman. I fear that it is a highly politicized middleman. And I fear that with enough hard bargaining, suppliers will leave the industry — as many have ever since Medicare and Medicaid began to “bargain hard.”
Think of the many readers of the NY Times op-ed page, many predisposed to this silliness, who get their public policy economics from Krugman.

A challenge to the NCAA’s regulation of collegiate athletics

ncaa.jpgThis post from about a year ago addressed the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s longstanding and dubious regulation of intercollegiate athletics, and now a class action antitrust lawsuit is asserting a pretty hefty damage claim against the NCAA that directly challenges the organization’s regulatory system.
This ESPN.com article reports on the antitrust suit that was filed last week in Los Angeles on the theory that the NCAA has illegally conspired to prohibit member institutions from offering athletic scholarships that cover the ìfull costî of attending a college. The NCAA dictates a standard scholarship package in the form of a ìgrant-in-aid,î which covers tuition, room and board, books and a few other related expenses. However, it does not cover expenses such as phone bills and travel expenses, which many student-athletes from families with low incomes have a difficult time financing. As the ESPN.com article notes:

[A]thletes are the only students subject to aid restrictions imposed by an agreement among universities. Talented students in music, chemistry or any other area can be bid upon by individual colleges, without limits on the total value of their scholarship packages.

Continue reading

“Nine and eight”

Tiger-Woods.jpgThe PGA Tour is in La Jolla, California for the Accenture Match Play Championship this week, and the special format of that tournament has already produced some sparks between the competitors.
For you non-golfers, match play is different from the usual PGA tournament medal play format where the golfers simply play four rounds and the winner is the player with the lowest aggregate score. Match play, on the other hand, is similar to the normal game that golfers play in which they take on one opponent over 18 holes and the player who wins the most holes — regardless of the respective players’ aggregate score — wins the match. Inasmuch as match play involves two players playing against each other rather than against the entire field, the format often gets the competitive juices of the participants flowing more than a regular Tour event, particularly in matches between two players who do not care for one another.
Well, one of those matches occurred yesterday, and it happened to involve the world’s no. 1-rated player, Tiger Woods. Stephen Ames, a journeyman Tour player who holds the distinction of being the only Tour pro ever to emerge from Trinidad and Tobago, was pitted against Woods in a first round match, and Woods and Ames — as they say on the Tour — have “some issues” with each other.

Continue reading

Gene Elston — the best Stros announcer, ever

One of the biggest public relations blunders in Stros history was then-owner John McMullen’s decision in 1986 to fire Gene Elston, the first radio play-by-play announcer hired when the Stros club began as a Major League Baseball franchise in 1962.

Elston was the epitome of what a baseball announcer should be. His low-key, analytical, articulate and well-prepared approach resonated with Stros baseball fans, and McMullen’s ill-advised decision to fire the hugely popular Elston helped to cement McMullen’s fate as the second-most hated owner of a professional sports team in Houston (second only to the Oilers’ Bud Adams).

Elston was the antithesis of what is common among play-by-play announcers nowadays, who often substitute cheerleading for their employer over substance.

Inasmuch as Elston’s style was to go unnoticed, he is not well-known outside of Houston. But thankfully, that’s about to change as the 83 year-old Elston has been selected to receive the 2006 Ford C. Frick Award for broadcasting excellence from the National Baseball Hall of Fame (MLB.com article here). Elston will be honored during Hall of Fame induction weekend in late July in Cooperstown, N.Y.

Chronicle sportswriter John McClain — who has never even met Elston — contributes this fine column on how just listening to Elston strongly influenced his career, and provides the following insight into what made Elston’s style so compelling:

For those of you who weren’t fortunate enough to grow up with Gene Elston, here’s what you missed: He was the consummate professional who was admired and respected by just about everyone.

He wasn’t a homer. He could be critical without being mean. We knew we were getting an accurate and honest account of the game.

Elston wasn’t a screamer. He didn’t have a trademark phrase.

His style didn’t intrude on the action on the field. Truthfully, you hardly knew he was there, and yet he described the action in a way that made you feel as if you were sitting right next to him.

And he did it night after night for 25 years. From 1962 through 1986, there was nobody better than Elston.

And no matter how many more years the Astros do business, he’ll always be the best.

Baylor — the Notre Dame of Protestants?

notredame2.jpgBayloy Bear.gifAccording to this Baptist Standard op-ed, Baylor University in Waco has a model for what type of university it should aspire to be, but I don’t think the model is the one that Martin Luther had in mind — the University of Notre Dame:

Since former university President Robert Sloan led the school to adopt its Baylor 2012 long-range plan and open its Institute for Faith & Learning, supporters have pointed to Notre Dame as an example of a religiously affiliated school that successfully integrates faith and learning.
They maintain Notre Dame generally has accomplished what Baylor wants to achieveórecognized status as a top-tier university without surrendering to secularism. . . .
Baylor could come become the kind of national university that the best and brightest Protestant students will dream of attending, said Doug Henry, director of Baylorís Institute for Faith & Learning.
ìBaylor can have the same sort of image for Protestants that Notre Dame has for Catholics” . . . Henry said. ìIt can become the most intellectually interesting place to be, and a place where serious, smart Protestant and Baptist students will want to come. . . . Iíd say weíre about 30 years behind Notre Dame in terms of endowment, facilities, faculty and national prestige.î

Make that more like 75 years behind in terms of the football team, though.

Good news and bad news for Milberg Weiss

Milberg Weiss12.jpgThis NY Times article reports that Mel Weiss and Bill Lerach received good news and bad news earlier in the week regarding the longstanding criminal investigation against the two men and the Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman law firm over allegations of paying kickbacks in connection with class action lawsuits that the firm handled over the past decade.
The good news is that federal prosecutors have apparently informed Weiss and Lerach’s individual counsel that they will not seek an indictment against the two men.
The bad news is that the prosecutors still may go Arthur Andersen on the Milberg Weiss firm.
According to the Times article, two top Milberg Weiss partners — David Bershad and Steven Schulman — appear to be the main targets of the investigation. The heat on Milberg Weiss and its current and former partners was turned up last year when prosecutors indicted 78 year-old Seymour Lazar, a retired Southern California Palm Springs lawyer who was a plaintiff in at least 50 Milberg Weiss securities cases, with fraud and conspiracy. Prosecutors alleged that Lazar was involved in an alleged scheme with Milberg Weiss in which the firm secretly funneled him about $2.5 million for being the class representative in class action lawsuits that the firm handled. Lazar and Milberg Weiss contend that the payments were legal referral fees and deny that there was any effort to conceal them.
As noted in my previous posts on this matter, despite the irony that Weiss and Lerach are embroiled in a criminal investigation that is strikingly similar to the prosecution of agency costs that Weiss and Lerach profit from in connection with a good number of their class action securities fraud cases, I have great reservations about the government criminalizing the plaintiff’s lawyers’ conduct in these cases. Larry Ribstein shares those concerns, and notes with his usual keen insight:

To the extent that a goal of the case is to curtail securities class actions, this is not the way to do it. . . . Lerach and company are just products of the system that has been created by current law. Real reform requires changing the game, not just the players. How about this solution: getting rid of the ìfraud on the marketî theory?

Meanwhile, Bruce Carton has more on the ubiquitous Lerach in this second excerpt from Joseph C. Goulden’s new book, The Money Lawyers (previous excerpt here), which includes Lerach’s description of how his first meeting with Weiss transformed him from a boring Pittsburgh defense lawyer into an exciting plaintiff’s lawyer:

“Mel sat there like the complete master of the universe. He was barking orders right and left, saying which lawyer would do what, laying out the scenario for what would happen in court the next day. He was in complete charge, and all of us sat there saying, ‘Yes, Mel, you’re right, whatever you want. . . .’ Man, I was impressed. Mel was the smartest lawyer I had ever seen. I was used to dealing with the uptight, stuffy defense lawyers. Now I was definitely on the other side of the spectrum.”

NatWest Three prepare for a long trip to Houston

Natwest three5.jpgThe downtown Federal Detention Facility is not normally the destination of choice for U.K. bankers traveling to Houston, but it is looking increasingly as if that’s where three former U.K. bankers embroiled in a transaction devised by former Enron CFO Andy Fastow will be spending a considerable amount of time in the near future.
As this Forbes article reports, former NatWest bankers David Bermingham, Giles Darby and Gary Mulgrew lost their High Court appeal to avoid extradition to Houston to face charges that they bilked their former employer of $7.3 million in one of the schemes allegedly engineered by former Enron CFO Andrew Fastow and his right hand man, Michael Kopper (previous posts are here). After the High Court’s decision was announced, the three ex-bankers said that they intend to appeal to the House of Lords, the U.K.’s highest court.
The case is particularly interesting because NatWest — the institution that the Enron Task Force contends was bilked by the three former bankers — never sought to recover the allegedly bilked funds from the three men, never pursued criminal charges against them in England, and neither the Crown Prosecution Service, the Financial Services Authority nor the Serious Fraud Office in the UK found sufficient evidence to prosecute. Had a trial taken place in the U.K., the three men could not be extradited to the U.S. because of the principle of double jeopardy, but since no British trial has taken place, the British Home Secretary has granted the Enron Task Force’s request under the Extradition Act of 2003, which was passed to facilitate extradition of suspected terrorists to the U.S. Under that legislation, the Home Secretary can extradite British citizens without the U.S. authorities having to make a prima facie case — they need only set forth a statement of the facts that they hope to prove. Moreover, the Extradition Act is not recipricol — to extradite an American citizen from the U.S., the British still need to provide evidence that the American citizen has committed an extraditable offense.
Thus, if the bankers lose their appeal to the House of Lords and are extradited to Houston, they will be forced to prepare the defense of their case while imprisoned in Houston’s Federal Detention Facility. Meanwhile, their main accusers — Fastow and Kopper — remain living comfortably in River Oaks and Montrose.
Chalk it up as another example of the high price of asserting innocence.

Meanwhile, over in the natural gas markets . . .

o'reillyhand.jpgAs oil prices reversed a downward trend and rose over the weekend on the news of more Nigerian political problems (James Hamilton explains why this is important), the roller coaster of emotions that is the natural gas market continued unabated.
Just over two months after prices hit an all-time high amid fears of shortages this winter, the natural gas market is flush with a record amount of gas and, as a result, natural gas prices are in full retreat. A U.S. government report last week reflected that natural gas supplies in underground storage facilities are almost 45% above what is normal for this time of year and now speculation is increasing that a record amount of gas will be left over from winter as the weather warms in the midwest and northeast U.S. this spring. As a result, prices for natural gas settled last Friday at $7.182 a million British thermal units, which compares with the $15.378 per million British thermal units closing price on December 13th. The drop in prices is allowing industrial buyers of gas to enter the long side of the market and hedge their risk of higher prices in the future.
No word yet from Bill O’Reilly on how the big oil and gas companies allowed such a situation to occur.

Didn’t you have a feeling this was coming?

radio_shack_logo4.gifAfter a bad week, Ft. Worth-based RadioShack Corp. Chief Executive Dave Edmondson resigned yesterday by “mutual agreement” with the company’s board under which Edmundson will receive a severance package valued at about $1.5 million.
Public disclosure early last week of Edmundson’s resumÈ fluffing was bad enough, but the final straw in Edmundson’s fate was RadioShack’s announcement late last week that it is planning on closing as many as 700 stores and taking a large write-down. Although company revenue rose about 5% to $1.67 billion in the quarter ended Dec. 31, the company’s profit for the quarter dropped 62% to just under $50 million (or 36 cents a share) from about $130 million (81 cents a share) in the same quarter a year ago. Its shares lost over 8% of their value after the annoucement and hit a 52-week low of $18.80 in trading on the New York Stock Exchange during this past day.
Despite the distraction of Edmundson’s problems, his quick exit may actually help RadioShack. This is a company that is desperately in need of a new vision — or at least a plan — and it was clear that Edmundson no longer had the credibility with the board and employees to pull one together. It’s hard for a company to distinguish itself in the marketplace when all it seems to be doing is selling cellphones.
Meanwhile, the Wired GC points out that the Edmundson/Radio Shack affair actually reflects a simple lesson — effective leaders lead by example.

Has Chief Hurtt blown a fuse?

hurtt.jpgAnne Linehan and Charles Kuffner are two of Houston’s best bloggers on local political matters, and they have been covering an emerging story that amazingly appears to be flying below the radar screen of most Houstonians — i.e., Houston Police Chief Harold Hurtt‘s plan announced last week proposing to place surveillance cameras in apartment complexes, downtown streets, shopping malls and even private homes to fight crime during a shortage of police officers.

Building permits should require malls and large apartment complexes to install surveillance cameras, Hurtt said. And if a homeowner requires repeated police response, it is reasonable to require camera surveillance of the property, he said.

And the Chief’s justification for surveillance cameras in private homes?:

“I know a lot of people are concerned about Big Brother, but my response to that is, if you are not doing anything wrong, why should you worry about it?”

H’mm. That is not the kind of reasoning that one would find in, say, The Federalist Papers, now is it?
Based on the above response, it appears that Chief Hurtt must have been asleep during the Constitutional Law course while earning his criminal justice degree. Except that, it turns out that the Chief doesn’t have a criminal justice degree. Rather, he has a bachelor’s degree in sociology from Arizona State University and a master’s in something called “organizational management” from the University of Phoenix.
As you might expect, as this story filters through the media and blogosphere, people are scratching their heads and wondering exactly what is going on down here. The Spoof ran a story under the headline “President Bush taps Harold Hurtt to replace Michael Chertoff”:

WASHINGTON, D.C. — After hearing Houston Police Chief Harold Hurtt’s remarks in one of the Police Chief’s recent press conferences, President George W. Bush gave praise to Chief Hurtt.
“He wants cameras in people’s homes. That is my kind of man,” said President Bush. “This man is going to be my new Homeland Security czar.”
When Chief Hurtt was asked by one reporter why people who aren’t doing anything wrong should be surveilled, he responded: “Only al Qaeda sympathizers and terrorists would protest such a policy. Are you with bin Laden?”
“It was that response to the reporter’s question that really got the President’s attention,” explained White House aide Emma Faker.

Seriously, I recognize that Mayor White is a competent fellow and has a reasonably good understanding of what makes Houston tick. But how is it that Chief Hurtt’s outrageous public comments aren’t grounds for termination of his employment in a position where he is supposed to be responsible for securing the rights of citizens?