The DeBakey-Cooley rift

One of the most well-known stories of Houston lore — yet not discussed publicly much — is the long-time rift that has existed between two giants of cardiovascular surgery and of Houston’s amazing Texas Medical Center, Dr. Michael DeBakey of the DeBakey Heart Institute and the Baylor College of Medicine, and Dr. Denton Cooley of the Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital. That rift has resulted in Dr. DeBakey and Dr. Cooley rarely speaking to each other over the past 40 years.
As a result of the major announcement of this past Wednesday that Baylor College of Medicine is changing its primary teaching facility from Methodist Hospital to St. Luke’s, Dr. DeBakey (of Baylor) and Dr. Cooley (or St. Luke’s) are being forced to speak to each other again, at least to a limited extent. As this Chronicle artice reports, the first meeting occurred yesterday when both Dr. DeBakey and Dr. Cooley attended a meeting in which the historic agreement linking Baylor and St. Luke’s was consummated. Cooley, 83, and DeBakey, 95, shook hands and greeted each other, then sat down at a table where institutional leaders signed contracts making St. Luke’s the primary teaching hospital for Baylor. As the Chronicle report notes:

The pair’s relationship dates back to 1951, when DeBakey offered Cooley a job at Baylor, allowing the Houston native to return home after completing his training at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. For the next decade the two would collaborate closely.
Cooley left in 1962 to found the Texas Heart Institute, acknowledging that directly competing with DeBakey in the same hospital became problematic. The two remained friends and were both still on the Baylor faculty, but no longer operated together.
In 1965, DeBakey participated in a federally funded program to design an artificial heart. Within a few years he had a device that some physicians felt was ready for human trials, but DeBakey believed it needed more work.
Then, to international acclaim in 1969, Cooley performed the first artificial heart implant in the chest of 47-year-old Haskell Karp, a dying heart surgery patient. Karp lived with the heart in his chest 65 hours before dying shortly after a heart transplant.
But Cooley’s notoriety was quickly tarnished after DeBakey said the heart was identical to one under development in the Baylor labs, and that Cooley had used it without permission.
Cooley said he and Dr. Domingo Liotta, who also designed artificial hearts in DeBakey’s lab, had built the heart privately, and that he had no choice but to use the heart because the patient’s life was in jeopardy.
In a 2004 interview, Methodist heart surgeon Mike Reardon said the episode “stole DeBakey’s shot at a Nobel Prize. What Mike needed was one crowning event to make him a candidate. And that was going to be the artificial heart.”
After the incident the American College of Surgeons voted to censure Cooley and, amid a dispute with the trustees of Baylor, Cooley resigned from the institution. DeBakey changed his focus and decided funds would be better spent developing pumps to assist failing hearts. Such devices became the mainstream treatment for patients with failing hearts.

We officially have a controversy on the Tour

As noted here earlier, it appeared that Tour pro Stewart Cink improved his lie on the shot that set up his winning birdie putt to beat Ted Purdy on the fifth playoff hole of the MCI Heritage Class Golf Tournament last Sunday. Although several television viewers called in to report Cink’s apparent rules violattion, Tour officials quickly denied the alleged rules violation after Cink sunk his birdie putt and delared the popular Cink the tournament champ.
Now, it appears that ruling went over about as well as a turd in the punchbowl with a number of Tour players. Today, the Chronicle reports that Purdy in particular is not pleased:

“Every player that’s come up to me said `I got robbed,’ and everybody around the world is saying the same thing,” said Purdy upon completion of his first round Thursday at the Shell Houston Open.
“I bet the founders (of golf) in Scotland, our forefathers, are rolling over in their graves.”

Inasmuch as it was clear from the telecast that, in sweeping away loose impediments, Cink created an indentation behind his ball to lessen the risk that his wedge would bounce off the surface of the waste bunker before striking his ball, Purdy is not buying the Tour rules officials’ reasoning on the dispute. Purdy had a phone conversation with Slugger White, the PGA Tour tournament director and referee in chief, on Wednesday about the controversy. After shooting an even-par 72 in the first round of the Shell Houston Open at Redstone Golf Club, Purdy expressed continued skepticism about the ruling and the message it sends. According to Purdy, White felt everything in the waste area was movable.

“Why Stewart was being so careful, I don’t know,” Purdy said.
Because Cink was in a waste area and not a bunker, he could ground his club, take practice swings and remove loose impediments.
“But it’s still sand, it’s still crushed shells,” Purdy said. “I think the rule needs to say you can’t move the sand.
“Apparently Slugger doesn’t believe in sand.”

In fact, the rules are already clear that what Cink did was wrong. Rule 13.2 of the Rules of Golf states in relevant part as follows:

13-2. Improving Lie, Area of Intended Stance or Swing, or Line of Play A player must not improve or allow to be improved: ? the position or lie of his ball, by any of the following actions: ? creating or eliminating irregularities of surface, [or] ? removing or pressing down sand, loose soil, replaced divots or other cut turf placed in position . . .

Cink improved his lie and should have been called on it. Purdy should have won that golf tournament.

Cards sweep ‘Stros

The Cardinals completed the sweep of the Astros on Thursday night by squeezing in a run in the 12th to take a 2-1 victory. Roy O and Jason Marquis were locked in a pitching dual for most of the game, and you had a sense that it was not the Astros’ night when the team’s fastest player, Adam Everett, was thrown out at third base in the 7th on a nice throw from Jim Edmunds (close play, though). Of course, Biggio followed with an RBI single, which would have plated two and won the game if Everett had not been nailed.
The series revealed the Astros’ weakness that I noted earlier here on Opening Day — that is, this team will struggle to score runs during stretches of the season. They scored only 10 in three games against the Cards, and six of those were in the blowout loss in the second game of the series. The ‘Stros now move on to Denver for a three game set with the Rockies this weekend (Brandon Duckworth starts the opener in place of the rehabbing Andy Pettitte), then move on to Pittsburgh for three before returning to the Juice Box next Friday for a four game series with the Reds.
By the way, one of the highlights of the game last night was a real free-for-all between two fans in the stands during the bottom of the 11th. One of the two fellows involved in the fight quickly got the upper hand and was really hammering the other guy when the police finally broke it up. The police escorted one of the two guys from the stadium, but I couldn’t tell whether it was the fellow who got creamed or the winner by TKO who got removed.

SCOTUS turns down Clarett motion for stay

As expected, the U.S. Supreme Court turned down football player Maurice Clarett’s motion to stay the Second Circuit’s order of earlier this week that bars Clarett and similarly situated underclassmen from this weekend’s NFL Draft pending the Second Circuit’s final adjudication of the NFL’s appeal of the U.S. District Court decision that enjoined the NFL from barring Clarett and similarly situated underclassmen from the NFL Draft. The SCOTUS’ reasoning was the same as the Second Circuit’s. Inasmuch as the NFL has already agreed to conduct a supplemental draft for Clarett and others like him before the upcoming NFL seaosn if the Second Circuit upholds the District Court’s decision, SCOTUS concluded that there was no material harm to Clarett and the others in barring them from this weekend’s draft pending the Second Circuit’s ruling on the merits of the NFL’s appeal.

Libertarian dilemma

From the “News in Brief” section of the Onion:

Libertarian Reluctantly Calls Fire Department
CHEYENNE, WY?After attempting to contain a living-room blaze started by a cigarette, card-carrying Libertarian Trent Jacobs reluctantly called the Cheyenne Fire Department Monday. “Although the community would do better to rely on an efficient, free-market fire-fighting service, the fact is that expensive, unnecessary public fire departments do exist,” Jacobs said. “Also, my house was burning down.” Jacobs did not offer to pay firefighters for their service.

VDH on the lessons of Vietnam

Victor Davis Hanson answers the following question on his website:

My question is about the lessons of Vietnam. In your book, ‘Carnage and Culture’ . . . you point out that millions died as a result of our withdrawal. You also point out the hypocrisy of the left in ignoring this point. It seems like we’re now in the exact same situation as we were then, a tenuous military situation in Iraq and the radical left screeching to get out. How do we avoid the catastrophic mistake of Vietnam?

Hanson: We must hope that we are folk more like that of the Okinawa-generation than the Mogadishu public. If we take Fallujah, and alienate and end Sadr?s militia, then the reconstruction will be back on track?offering more of a moral boost than before the present turmoil. The entire struggle depends on whether the United States believes we are in a real war? or whether we think this is a criminal matter. Imagine May 1945 in the midst of trying to dislodge the Japanese from Sugar Loaf Hill: would we engage in national inquiry about who got us into the war with Japan? Or blame each other over Pearl Harbor? Become despondent from horrific footage of suicide bombers? Cease the assault and ask to parley with Japanese generals? Or begin a national debate about leaving the Pacific to avoid such seemingly senseless carnage?

Big Medical Center news: Baylor picks St. Luke’s over Methodist

In a move that has been expected for over a year but nevertheless shakes the foundation of Houston’s huge Texas Medical Center community, Baylor College of Medicine announced yesterday that it is ending its 50 year primary affiliation with Methodist Hospital as its main teaching hospital and entering into an agreement to make St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital its primary teaching hospital.
Baylor (which has no affiliation with Baylor University in Waco) is one of two medical schools in the Medical Center (the University of Texas Health Science Center is the other) and the older of the two. In addition to the financial considerations that induced Baylor to make the move, the affiliation with St. Luke’s now gives Baylor a direct relationship with two of the Medical Center’s best hospitals, St. Luke’s and its world-renowned affiliate, Texas Children’s Hospital.
Although the severing of the Baylor-Methodist relationship is unfortunate in several respects, it may turn out to be a good thing for the Medical Center as a whole if Methodist and UT agree that Methodist would become UT’s main teaching facility in the Medical Center. Such a relationship would give Methodist a direct relationship with another of the Medical Center’s world recognized hospitals — UT’s M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and would either supplement or replace UT’s existing relationship with the Memorial Hermann Hospital System. UT’s relationship with Memorial Hermann has always been hindered by Memorial Hermann’s relatively limited presence in the Medical Center, where its only hospital is Hermann Hospital, which is much smaller than either Methodist or St. Luke’s.

Redding checking flights to New Orleans

Tim Redding‘s start this season went from mediocre to disastrous this evening as the Redbirds lit him up for 8 runs in three and two thirds innings on their way to routing the ‘Stros, 12-6. Just for good measure, Jim Edmunds cranked a grand salami off of Ricky Stone in the fifth to make sure that the ‘Stros didn’t have any illusions about making a game of it.
Redding now attempts to avoid Manager Jimy Williams for the next several days as the skipper contemplates calling up either Jared Fernandez (54 ERA, but 8 scoreless innings since going down to AAA New Orleans) or rehabbing Carlos Hernandez (0.84 ERA in 10 innings at New Orleans) to replace the listing Redding in the starting rotation.
Roy O will take the hill as the ‘Stros try to salvage one game of the three game set with the Cards tomorrow night. After that game, the Astros go to Denver and Pittsburgh before returning home for a series next weekend against the Reds.

Why Health Care Has No Wal-Mart

This short BusinessWeek Online story does a good job of summarizing the reasons why America’s health care finance system hinders the decline in prices in health care that Americans have enjoyed in many other sectors of the economy, most notably retail sales (ala the Wal-Mart reference). One big reason noted:

Sometimes, however, Americans use more care because they think it’s free, or almost free. And that’s one big reason why health care hasn’t become Wal-Mart-ized. When you buy that DVD player, you whip out your credit card and pay with your own money. That makes you want to comparison shop for the best deal. But when it comes to buying drugs, consumers have little incentive to shop around. If you have good insurance, you’re going to pay the same $10 or $15 whether you need the most expensive drugs or not.
A recent study that looked at drugs used to treat arthritis pain provides some insight. Arthritis sufferers can buy relatively inexpensive over-the-counter treatments, such as Motrin or similar generics, or much more costly prescription medications called cox-2 inhibitors, such as Celebrex or Vioxx. Both kinds provide equal pain relief, but the cox-2 drugs may reduce the chances of stomach bleeding or ulcers.
The study concluded that people with good drug insurance were twice as likely to get the more expensive drugs than those without insurance, whether they were at risk for bleeding or not. If someone else — the insurance company — is paying, price doesn’t matter.

Hat tip to the Mises Economics Blog for the line to this article.

Three Duke Energy traders indicted

Three former executives involved in Duke Energy‘s energy trading operation have been indicted in what the local U.S. Attorney’s Office contends was a fraudulent scheme to attain bonus compensation through making part of Duke Energy’s trading operations look profitable when they really were not.
Timothy Kramer, 40, former vice president of Duke Energy North America. Todd Reid, 41, former vice president, and Brian Lavielle, 33, a former trader were charged with racketeering, wire and mail fraud, and falsification of corporate books and records. All of them pled not guilty today and were released on $100,000 bond. If convicted on all counts, the defendants face prison sentences of anywhere from five years to life, in addition to forfeiture of $7 million in “false gains” plus penalties of up to $9 million.
The gist of the indictment is that the defendants allegedly ginned up phony electricity and natural-gas trades to boost trading volumes and inflate profits in a trading book that was the basis of their annual bonuses. The indictment alleges that there were 400 rigged trades that produced a $50 million profit in the trade book used for bonus calculations between March 2001 and May 2002. The schemes are alleged to have inflated bonuses for the defendants by a total of at least $7 million.
Moreover, this is the first federal case that I know of in which senior-level executives have been accused of devising schemes to generate trading profits in a “mark-to-market” book that determined bonuses, on one hand, and to enter losses in an “accrual” book that had no bearing on bonuses, on the other. Duke and many other energy trades used mark-to-market accounting to record profit and loss for energy contracts that might not settle for many years. However, the mark to market accounting method has come under intense scrutiny since the demise of Enron Corp. in late 2001 because of the latitude that the method allows in recording results.
Interestingly, the amount of money involved in the alleged fraud is relatively small when compared with Duke Energy’s pretax profits in 2001 from energy trading. Wholesale energy trading that year generated a pretax profit of $1.34 billion, and Duke’s wholesale-trading profits more than tripled from 2000 to 2001.