The futility of regulating failure

failure-300x300 David Warren makes a remarkably lucid point about the dubious notion that governmental action is the proper remedy to any wrong:

Politicians try to pass laws against it; to create rules and regulations so complex and cumbersome that (as we saw in the BP disaster) an easily-corrupted "judgement call" bureaucracy must grant exemptions from them, in order for anything to function at all. When disaster strikes, they add more rules and regulations.

But more profoundly, the rules and regulations — once they pass a point of irreducible complexity — create a mindset in which those who should be thinking about safety are instead focused on rules and regulations. To those who see danger, the glib answer comes, citing all the safety standards that have been diligently observed.

From what we already know, this appears to be exactly what happened aboard Deepwater Horizon, and will not be rectified by the U.S. government’s latest, very political decision, to use means both fair and foul to prosecute British Petroleum, and punish the rest of the oil industry for its mistakes.

Let me mention in passing that President Barack Obama was in no way responsible for the catastrophe, and that there is nothing he can do about it. He is being held to blame for "inaction," as wrongly as his predecessor was held to blame over Hurricane Katrina, by media and public unable to cope with the proposition that, "Stuff happens."

In a sense, Obama is hoist on his own petard. The man who blames Bush for everything now finds there are some things presidents cannot do. More deeply, the opposition party that persuades the public government can solve all their problems, discovers once in power there are problems their government cannot solve.

Alas, it will take more time than they have to learn the next lesson: that governments which try to solve the insoluble, more or less invariably, make each problem worse.

I like to dwell on the wisdom of our ancestors. It took us millennia to emerge from the primitive notion that a malignant agency must lie behind every unfortunate experience. Indeed, the Catholic Church spent centuries fighting folk pagan beliefs in things like evil fairies, and the whole notion the Devil can compel any person to act against his will — only to watch an explosion of witch-hunting and related popular hysterias at the time of the Reformation.

In so many ways, the trend of post-Christian society today is back to pagan superstitions: to the belief that malice lies behind every misfortune, and to the related idea that various, essentially pagan charms can be used to ward off that to which all flesh is heir. The belief that, for instance, laws can be passed, that change the entire order of nature, is among the most irrational of these.

Sheer human stupidity is the cause of any number of human catastrophes — including the stupidity of superstition itself. We need to re-embrace this concept; to hug the native incompetence within ourselves, and begin forgiving it in others.

Amen.

3 thoughts on “The futility of regulating failure

  1. “The man who blames Bush for everything now finds there are some things presidents cannot do.”
    I don’t believe it. I don’t believe any of these guys, Bush (either of them), Obama, Clinton (either of them), or any other president or senator, hardly any representatives or bureaucrats, have any idea that there are some things that they can not do. I know that they are that arrogant, I’m betting that they are that stupid.
    jd

  2. I prefer to look at “embracing stupidity” as embracing the fact that as humans we cannot be knowledgeable about everything, in fact we can be knowledgeable of only a circumscribed minority of all things which can be known. We learn more from experience (experimentation) than from visualizing what can go wrong and “regulating” against it. The latter course often has us throwing out the baby of success with the bath water of the risk of the unknown.
    Mike

  3. Excellent point. Ironically, we have the Usual Suspects demanding that we turn to “alternative energy” which will be a bigger disaster than any oil spill could be. Whenever something happens, our politicians demand that the government destroy even more wealth.

Leave a Reply