It all started with this Holman Jenkins/WSJ column in which he blasted the Federal Trade Commission’s vacuous campaign against the proposed Whole Foods-Wild Oats merger.
That prompted this WSJ letter-to-the-editor from Arnie Celnicker, a former attorney for the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department, in which he contends, among other things, that the complexities of markets is such that “[t]he fact that I can now buy organic milk at Wal-Mart tells us something, but very little, about the realistic nature of competition between Whole Foods and Wal-Mart, or about the effect of Whole Foods’ acquisition of Wild Oats.”
Which prompted Don Boudreaux to throw up his hands in exasperation:

How in the name of free-range chicken do these facts justify government blocking this merger? Precisely because consumers now want more and more organic products, financial markets have every incentive to invest in firms catering to this growing market if these firms are well-managed. Wild Oats’ inability to get adequate private financing in this growing market is strong evidence that its assets now are poorly managed. It’s only natural that Whole Foods spots and seizes this opportunity to use these assets more effectively at meeting consumer demands. The FTC’s interference – an unwholesome additive to the market – jeopardizes consumer well-being.

Not to speak of the jeopardy in which the FTC’s interference places the investment of Wild Oats shareholders.