If your friends or co-workers who follow college football closely are acting a bit stressed out today, then it’s quite likely that the source of their anxiety is a 17 or 18 year old who they have never met.
Yes, today is that day of the absurd dubbed “National Signing Day” when we are deluged with the rather odd spectacle of grown men fawning over high school football players to induce them to come take advantage of their university’s resort facilities rather than their competition’s resort facilities. And, oh yeah, if they can earn a few “tips” from well-heeled alums while enjoying those resort facilities, then that’s alright, too.
Indeed, this NY Times article already suggests that the University of Illinois’ inexplicably strong recruiting class this year may be the result of cheating. With the proliferation of the blogosphere over the past couple of years, a host of blogs follow the recruiting wars closely and often with keen wit. The following are a few of the interesting posts on this year’s recruiting season that I’ve stumbled across:

The Wizard of Odds explains why all of this competition over the quality of recruiting classes is largely meaningless;
The Sunday Morning QB examines the strange system in which all of this has evolved;
The House that Rock Built explores the ripple effect of recruiting decisions;
Every Day Should Be a Saturday reveals how recruiting foretold Rex Grossman’s mediocre Super Bowl performance (just kidding);
A widget that displays a map reflecting where a school’s recruits are coming from; and
The College Football Resource page has more information than you should ever want to know about this year’s top recruits and where they are going.

Meanwhile, as university presidents continue to dither over this fundamentally flawed system of regulating rents, this post from a couple of years ago suggests that a better system is readily available so long as the colleges forsake being the NFL’s free minor league system, a position with which Malcolm Gladwell agrees. As noted earlier here, big-time college football as presently structured is hopelessly corrupt, but it’s a pretty darn entertaining form of corruption. Adopting a structure much closer to college baseball would likely minimize the corruptive elements of college football while not affecting the entertainment value of the sport much. But it’s going to take leadership and courage from the top of the universities to promote and implement such a reform.
What are the chances of such leadership emerging? Probably about the same as Rice knocking off Texas next season in Austin.