Chronicle sports columnist Richard Justice wrote the following answer to a question in his blog recently (toward the end of the blog post):

I love [disabled Stros slugger Jeff Bagwell] to death, but his big contract and him not wanting to admitt his playing day’s are over has cost this 2006 team more than we thought it would.
I don’t think so. Drayton McLane was told last summer that if he allowed Bagwell to be activated in September, his chances of winning an insurance claim would be reduced 50 percent. He was advised not to let him come to spring training because they’d be reduced another 50 percent.
He made the decision because it was the right thing to do. Did he nudge Bagwell toward retirement? Sure he did. No matter what happened, he was going to be obligated to pay Bagwell $17 million this season. What happens between the Astros and the insurance company may takes years to settle.
There’s a fairness issue. Bagwell wanted to play. He still wants to play. Problem is, he can’t. One doctor told him he has the biggest bone spur in his right shoulder he’d ever seen. If Bagwell chooses to have it removed, he risks doing permanent damage to his deltoid muscle. His alternative is a shoulder replacement procedure. Neither choice is very good.
To the many people who ask, he comes around only occasionally. He has purchased a home in San Diego and spends more and more time there. He also has a home in Cabo San Lucas and spends time there.

So, Justice is suggesting that Stros owner Drayton McLane acted reasonably with regard to Bags’ injury? How on earth does Justice square that view with his broadsides against McLane over McLane’s handling of the Bagwell injury situation set forth in previous blog posts here, here, here and here?
Kevin Whited over at blogHouston.net has previously noted the tendency of Justice to take both sides of an issue, although not usually in the same article. However, Justice’s diplomatic blog post above regarding McLane’s handling of the Bagwell injury situation is hard to square with his previous over-the-top criticism of McLane in regard to the matter while, at the same time, ignoring Bagwell’s somewhat childish behavior.
I’ll give Justice credit in that he is willing to admit when he takes a position that turns out wrong. Will Justice publicly apologize to McLane for his previous criticism of him over the Bagwell injury situation? Inquiring minds want to know.