Neil Coulbeck, former chief of North American financial markets for NatWestís corporate bank who provided evidence to the F.B.I. and the Justice Department about Enron-related transactions involving three former NatWest Bank colleagues, was found dead in an East London park Tuesday less than two days before the politically-charged extradition of his former colleagues to Houston to stand trial. Although the death is still under investigation, early speculation is that Coulbeck committed suicide. Previous posts on the case of the NatWest Three are here.
Earlier today, American marshals took the NatWest Three ó David Bermingham, Giles Darby and Gary Mulgrew ó into custody in London in preparation for flying them to the Houston. The Enron Task Force indicted the three over a transaction involving the sale of NatWestís stake in an Enron-related asset that prosecutors contend was structured by the former bankers to give NatWest less profit than it should have had while personally benefiting the bankers and several former Enron executives, principally former CFO Andrew Fastow. The three former bankers deny any criminal conduct and the successor to NatWest Bank ó Royal Bank of Scotland ó has not pressed either criminal or civil charges against the men.
The fate of the bankers has generated a political firestorm in the UK over the past year as British politicians and business executives have criticized their extraditon to the United States as the product of overzealous American prosecution of business interests after the bursting of the late 1990’s stock market bubble. The political controversy centers on a treaty between the US and UK that was signed soon after the 9/11 attacks to facilitate the extradition of suspected terrorists. The treaty permits either country to extradite citizens of the other on more limited evidence than previously required, and US is now using the treaty to facilitate prosecutions against business interests rather than just suspected terrorists despite the fact that the US has not ratified the treaty (the UK ratified it 2004). On Tuesday, the House of Lords passed a resolution to overturn the treaty and the treaty was debated Wednesday in Parliament.
Interestingly, during the Wednesday debate in Parliament, British Prime Minister Tony Blair ó who supports the extradition ó stated that the three bankers would probably to be granted bail in Houston. Given the strict conditions for release on bail that has been required in previous Enron-related prosecutions, I wonder if Mr. Blair knows something that we don’t?
It’s interesting to watch how this issue is being portrayed in the UK where, perhaps for once, the City, Libertarians and the Left are showing a united front.
Sympathy for the Nat West 3 is limited though most have some concern about the likelihood of an extended period of custody prior to initiation of court proceedings. This process differs significantly to the UK process where the charged, when unlikely to provide a threat to the public, are allowed to remain in the community on police bail while preparing their defence.
The biggest uproar rises against the extradition treaty is itself and the lack of ratificaton by the US: no parity is no party.
Concern is being expressed about the rightness of a UK citizen, residing in the UK being charged for an aciton in the UK, that was an offence in the United States – but not in the UK. Add to the that the lack of parity, and much of the popular press lampoons Mr Blair for allowing the UK to be the 51st State.
It will be interesting to see whether Her Majesty’s representatives in Washington start a flurry of activity to extradite those who actively participated in fund raising for the IRA, and whether those responsible for management of Guantanmo Bay should they be found to have transgressed the law of England and Wales!