This Wall Street Journal ($) article reports that Harvey Miller — the New York attorney who built Weil, Gotshal & Manges‘ bankruptcy and corporate reorganization practice into a national dynamo before leaving the firm in 2002 to join Greenhill & Co. — is being accused of overbilling his client Loral Space & Communications Ltd. of as much as $3.6 million in the company’s recently concluded corporate reorganization case.
To add intrigue to the matter, Miller’s chief accuser is the creditors’ committee counsel in the Loral case, Akin, Gump, which incurred the wrath of Miller’s opinion last year in the Vermont bankruptcy case of FiberMark Inc., in which Miller concluded that the firm should forfeit a “significant portion” of its fees in that case because Akin, Gump gave allegedly biased advice to the FiberMark creditors’ committee. Akin, Gump is reportedly prepared to waive $1.5 million of its total remaining unpaid fee of $4.0 million in that case.
The challenge to Miller’s fee-charging is particularly interesting in that Miller was at the forefront of the movement to attract top-notch legal talent to the U.S. bankruptcy and reorganization legal field over the past 30 years. One of the ways that was accomplished was through the incorporation into the U.S. Bankruptcy Code of provisions that provide for attorneys to be compensated at the market rate for providing professional services to debtors in bankruptcy cases. For many years while at Weil, Miller’s hourly billing rate was among the highest of any attorney practicing bankruptcy law in the United States, and Weil’s fees for representing corporate debtors in a number of reorganization cases have been among the highest ever approved and paid. Those high fees are the genesis of the nickname for Weil, Gotshal & Manges among some envious members of the bankruptcy bar — “We’ll, Getcha & Mangle Ya.”
Update: The prescient Peter Lattman provides even more interesting background.
Tom,
Before getting back to my preferred life as the Chronicle’s science writer, I had the assignment of covering Enron’s bankruptcy case. As you know, Weil Gotshal was Enron’s lead counsel. I spent many an hour in the federal courtroom at the southern tip of Manhattan Island, dealing with the Weil Gotshal folks.
Frankly, it was an unpleasant experience. Moreover, the fact that the former head of their bankruptcy unit was busted for churning up fees does not shock me.
In retrospect, it all seemed pretty simple to me: by picking New York as a venue, the company got a judge sympathetic to its wishes, the law firm got a cash cow, and the judge got a lot of New York-based support for his continuing to remain on the bankruptcy bench. Worked for everyone, I guess.
Eric
Eric, in the mid-1980’s, Weil, Gotshal had a bad experience with a local Bankruptcy Judge in a chapter 11 case that they were handling in Houston. That was the last chapter 11 case that the firm filed in Houston.
There is little question that the Enron bankruptcy case should have been filed here. My sense is that Enron’s beleaguered management allowed Weil Gotshal to make the call on where to file, and they filed it in the firm’s favorite court.