Is Lerach a target?

Lerachenrondocs150ap2.jpgThe dozens of securities fraud lawsuits against Enron and various other parties are consolidated under the federal multi-district litigation rules in Houston federal court. The legal community involved in those cases is abuzz today with the news that a federal indictment last week of two Southern California lawyers is a sign that the lead plaintiff’s lawyer in the Enron securities fraud litigation — William Lerach — and his former firm (Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach) may also be targets of the investigation. Mr. Lerach and Milberg Weiss split last year, and Mr. Lerach started a new firm based in San Diego.
The indictment of almost 70 pages (press release here) accuses a former Milberg Weiss client — Palm Springs lawyer Seymour Lazar — of taking $2.4 million in kickbacks from a “New York law firm,” presumably Milberg Weiss. Although Mr. Lazar’s personal attorney — Paul Selzer — was also named in the indictment, the indictment contains no formal charges against “the New York firm.” The indictment alleges that the New York firm reaped $44 million in attorney fees from over 50 cases in which Mr. Lazar was the lead plaintiff. As an inducement for Mr. Lazar and his family members to serve as lead plaintiff, the indictment alleges that the New York firm and others secretly paid Mr. Lazar kickbacks out of a portion of the firm’s attorneys fees.
The indictment is the result of an investigation that began in 2002 that resulted in subpoenas being issued to dozens of law firms that have been co-counsel with Milberg Weiss in securities fraud class action cases over the years. Speculation is rampant throughout the plaintiffs’ securities class action bar that the purpose of the indictment of Messrs. Lazar and Selzer is to pressure them to turn on the former Milberg Weiss lawyers.
In addition to observing that it is “saddened” by the indictment, a Milberg Weiss press release stated the following:

“We are also surprised and disappointed that, in the face of recent criticism of the government following the reversal of the Arthur Andersen conviction, the U.S. attorney’s office would risk harming the Milberg Weiss firm and its many fine lawyers and staff by making this accusation in circumstances where the firm cannot defend itself.”

As usual, Professor Ribstein provides insight and caution regarding this latest use of governmental power against an unpopular target (i.e., plaintiffs’ class action securities fraud lawyers) of the day. Moreover, check out Professor Hennings’ thoughts on the differences between the government’s potential case against Milberg, Weiss and the prosecution of Arthur Andersen, and Professor Bainbridge’s comments regarding the implications of the possible indictments on the prosecution of class actions.

8 thoughts on “Is Lerach a target?

  1. Interesting that you chose a picture of Lerach during one of his more loathsome stunts, inciting the anti-Enron lynch mob with the bogus claim that Enron had wrongfully shredded documents. Even the Enron Task Force, proven non-friend of Enron, couldn’t find any evidence to support that whopper. Yet that myth about Enron among so many others lives on, repeated with “Hopalong Cassidy” gusto in a similarly loathsome piece of fiction, the so-called “Enron movie” — wrongly categorized “documentary” — referenced in your “Throwing Popcorn at Enron” posting below.

  2. Andersen, KPMG and Milberg

    The W$J discusses a possible looming federal criminal indictment of the former Milberg, Weiss class action firm, noting that itís not clear which of the current versions of the firm (NY or San Diego) the government is looking at.

  3. Poetic Justice?

    Is there a smirk today in an executive office or boardroom near you?
    The Wall Street Journal reports $ this morning that:
    Federal prosecutors are investigating one of the nation’s most aggressive class-action law firms, Milberg Weiss Bershad …

  4. Milberg, Weiss Faces Possible Indictment

    Famed securities class action plaintiffs’ law firm Milberg, Weiss reportedly has been named in the indictment of Seymour Lazar. Mr. Lazar is a retired entertainment lawyer who has served as a plainitff in dozens of class actions over the years.The

  5. Milberg, Weiss Faces Possible Indictment

    Famed securities class action plaintiffs’ law firm Milberg, Weiss reportedly has been named in the indictment of Seymour Lazar. Mr. Lazar is a retired entertainment lawyer who has served as a plainitff in dozens of class actions over the years.The

  6. Blogosphere on potential Milberg Weiss indictment

    Tom Kirkendall, and Professors Ribstein, Bainbridge, and Henning on the prospect of charges against unindicted alleged co-conspirator Milberg Weiss (Jun. 27)….

  7. The difference is that a company like Arthur Andersen can legitimately complain that an indictment automatically destroys its business by harming its reputation in the eyes of clients. Surely Bill Lerach, the man who famously boasted that he “has no clients” because he picks them himself, would have no such concerns.

  8. I have been a similar situation with Mel Weiss reguarding predatory lending class action Vs. citibank. And am looking for legal representation.

Leave a Reply