January 31, 2007
Judge Gilmore vacates Kevin Howard's conviction
As predicted in this prior post, U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore this afternoon vacated the conviction of former Enron Broadband executive Kevin Howard (prior posts here) on five counts of conspiracy, wire fraud, and falsifying books and records. A copy of Judge Gilmore's decision can be downloaded here and Kristen Hays' Chronicle article on the decision is here. The NY Times story on the decision is here.
Inasmuch as Judge Gilmore vacated Howard's conviction, the Justice Department could try him again, which would be the third time on the same charges. Don't bet against the DOJ doing just that. The Enron Task Force prosecuted the first two cases against Howard in the same manner as the case against the defendants in the now utterly discredited Nigerian Barge case (see also here). The Task Force first asserted an unwarranted expansion of a criminal law intended to punish kickbacks and bribes against a businessman-defendant who did no such thing. Then, the Task Force took the case to trial and blatantly appealed to the strong juror resentment (see also here) against anyone having anything to do with Enron to obtain a popular conviction against a supposedly wealthy businessman. Shattered lives, families and careers now lie in the wake of this outrage. Who is going to answer for that?
Posted by Tom at January 31, 2007 4:31 PM |
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)