< The Huff deal and the state of the Stros | Main | Rice Press revived online >
July 13, 2006
Harmless error?
This previous post passed along the motion of former Enron Broadband executive Kevin Howard's motion for new trial based on serious allegations of juror misconduct and ex parte communications between the trial judge and the jury during deliberations (previous posts on the case are here).
In this reply filed earlier this week, the Enron Task Force takes the expected position that the allegations of juror misconduct were "internal" and not the product of "external forces" and, thus, do not justify a new trial. However, in response to Howard's allegations that U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore had at least two sessions in which she improperly discussed the case with jurors outside the earshot of Howard and the attorneys involved in the trial, the Task Force contends only that such communications constitute "harmless error."
A trial judge discussing the case ex parte with jurors while the jury in a highly-publicized, related trial is delivering its verdict amidst a media firestorm is "harmless error?" Looks to me as if Mr. Howard has a pretty good shot at reversal if that's the best the Task Force can come up with on that issue.
Posted by Tom at July 13, 2006 7:00 AM |
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)